Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal to create a SIG for Real User Monitoring #830

Closed
martinkuba opened this issue Sep 8, 2021 · 25 comments
Closed

Proposal to create a SIG for Real User Monitoring #830

martinkuba opened this issue Sep 8, 2021 · 25 comments

Comments

@martinkuba
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! I would like to propose that a new SIG is created for Real User Monitoring use cases.

The goal of this group, I think, should be standardizing how RUM data is represented, so that RUM instrumentation is portable across different backends/vendors.

Example use cases

  • representing user session
  • representing user interaction
  • representing events with no duration (e.g. paint timing, network change event)

There is a recent OTEP proposal that attempts to address these use cases by introducing a new signal in the OpenTelemetry data model. Based on the comments on this proposal, there seems to be a number of different opinions on how it should be tackled.

There is also an existing Slack channel for client-side telemetry where some of this has also been discussed.

The immediate focus of this group would be

  • decide whether a new signal is needed
  • decide which signals make sense for different use cases
  • define semantic conventions

If anyone else is interested, please comment.

@jkwatson
Copy link

jkwatson commented Sep 8, 2021

Yes please!

@scheler
Copy link

scheler commented Sep 8, 2021

Yes, please include me.

1 similar comment
@stefaneberl
Copy link

Yes, please include me.

@rr0214
Copy link

rr0214 commented Sep 8, 2021

yes, yes. I am interested.

@svrnm
Copy link
Member

svrnm commented Sep 9, 2021

+1

@martinkuba
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would like to propose meeting on Wednesdays 8am Pacific Time, which would work for European time zones. Please thumbs up if that works for you, or propose a different time.

@scheler
Copy link

scheler commented Sep 15, 2021 via email

@svrnm
Copy link
Member

svrnm commented Sep 15, 2021

If the meeting is scheduled for longer than 1hr, 8:30am Wednesday would conflict with the JS SIG, that starts at 9am (not sure how many people are interested in both)

@jkwatson
Copy link

If the meeting is scheduled for longer than 1hr, 8:30am Wednesday would conflict with the JS SIG, that starts at 9am (not sure how many people are interested in both)

I would think that the overlap would be quite high, given the need for browser-based RUM.

@martinkuba
Copy link
Contributor Author

1/2 hour weekly might be good enough, but a few other options I can think of

  1. Thursdays 9am Pacific - would conflict with Java, Python, and Swift, but probably ok?
  2. Tuesdays 10am - seems open, less ideal for EU folks
  3. Mondays 10am - same as above

@jkwatson
Copy link

  1. Thursdays 9am Pacific - would conflict with Java, Python, and Swift, but probably ok?

Conflicting with Java & Swift seems very problematic...given iOS and Android. ;)

@ssidhu-apm
Copy link

Very interested in joining. 8 / 8.30 am PT on Wednesdays for 30 minutes would be great (already added 👍 for both comments).

@ivomagi
Copy link

ivomagi commented Sep 15, 2021

Interested in joining 8 or 830 AM PT on Wed would match my European calendar

@martinkuba
Copy link
Contributor Author

Let's go with 8:30 on Wednesdays for 1/2 hour to start with. If we consistently need more time, then we can revisit.

@scheler
Copy link

scheler commented Sep 17, 2021 via email

@martinkuba
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tedsuo Would you be able to help us with putting this on the calendar?

@mtwo
Copy link
Member

mtwo commented Sep 23, 2021

Creating this now

@mtwo
Copy link
Member

mtwo commented Sep 23, 2021

Crap, we already have three meetings during that period and we only have three Zoom accounts. I'll contact the CNCF to make another account. For now I'm going to set the meeting to start at 9:00 so that it doesn't overlap.

@mtwo
Copy link
Member

mtwo commented Sep 23, 2021

Done. We can adjust the time to 8:30 once we get more Zoom accounts.

@mtwo mtwo closed this as completed Sep 23, 2021
@kalyansai99
Copy link

I am interested in joining too. Please include me. Thanks.

@jkwatson
Copy link

I am interested in joining too. Please include me. Thanks.

The meetings will be fully public, so feel free to join in! All are welcome.

@SergeyKanzhelev
Copy link
Member

Crap, we already have three meetings during that period and we only have three Zoom accounts. I'll contact the CNCF to make another account. For now I'm going to set the meeting to start at 9:00 so that it doesn't overlap.

there are four accounts. Please check the document

@mtwo
Copy link
Member

mtwo commented Sep 23, 2021

there are four accounts. Please check the document

Nice! I'll update this then. I've reduced my ask on #824 to only request one additional account.

@flands
Copy link
Contributor

flands commented Oct 9, 2021

Hey folks -- can someone add this to the SIG table in the README?

@mtwo
Copy link
Member

mtwo commented Oct 14, 2021

Created #879 to add this to the list

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests