Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

what about more moderators ? #10

Open
berak opened this issue Aug 22, 2015 · 24 comments
Open

what about more moderators ? #10

berak opened this issue Aug 22, 2015 · 24 comments

Comments

@berak
Copy link

berak commented Aug 22, 2015

i'd propose LBerger, sturkmen, foobar, theodore, LorenaGDL and also pklab / unxnut

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

Moderators for the moment: me, berak, Michael Burdinov, Guanta, Mathieu Barnachon, Haris which is already quite the list right? But I am always up for more help.

Some insights on the suggested names

  • LBerger & sturkmen --> good additions to the forum, but you notice that English is not their main language in their responses. So might not be the best options. On the other hand, the amount of responses coming from them is huge.
  • Theodore LorenaGDL --> good choices, clear and concise in their answers and willing to help anyone
  • pklab is Philip. I got the idea he is mostly active at the PR stuff, not sure if he is up to taking another job as a moderator. He is not that active on the forum.
  • Uxnut might be a good choice, not noticed him that much lately.
  • Foobar indeed good addition, but he is one of the guys not being able to access his current account :D

@berak
Copy link
Author

berak commented Oct 8, 2015

"but you notice that English is not their main language" - that applies to both of us, too ;)

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

true ^_^ I actually wanted too write something like, the quality of English, you know what I mean :D

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

@alekcac I do encourage you to set some new moderators! We could use them!

@alekcac
Copy link
Contributor

alekcac commented Nov 16, 2015

Ok, I will look at them and their activity. I will add info here later.

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

👍

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

@alekcac as far as I know new moderators have been added so this can be closed down?

@PkLab
Copy link

PkLab commented May 13, 2016

@StevenPuttemans I read this just now

pklab is Philip

What do you mean ? I'm not so active with PR ?!? maybe some mistake

In any way, thank you for your consideration 😄

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

I mixed you up with Dikay I am afraid 😆

@berak
Copy link
Author

berak commented Dec 14, 2016

we definitely need some fresh blood here.

as of now, only steven and me seem to be left , and if both of us stay away for a day or so things pile up

LorenaGDL, LBerger, Tetragram seem to be willing to fill the ranks, just assign some more folks, please !

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

I agree.

Sorry for being at a conference for a week 😀. Not really the time to do my work from here 😋

@mshabunin
Copy link

@berak , I've added moderator rights to mentioned persons.

@berak
Copy link
Author

berak commented Dec 17, 2016

thanks a lot !

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

@mshabunin @berak thanks for getting more people to the club.
That being said, did anyone made them aware of their new powers?

@LorenaGdL
Copy link

LorenaGdL commented Dec 20, 2016

@StevenPuttemans I guess so, that little warning sign appears too often not to notice it ;)
In any case, it would be interesting if you have any tips/guidelines or whatever to give us

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

@LorenaGdL ;) true! Welcome to the club btw!

Well basically

  1. Delete spam, but try to be attentive at new users posts to not delete and block them.
  2. You can take breaks, if you do not feel like deleting, someone else will take over.
  3. Use your common sense in moderating topics I would say. But basically if you get these powers, this means that current moderators like your style and approach. So just keep doing what you do.
  4. Make sure if topics get locked or deleted, that you as moderator provide a clean explanation to the user as why this is happening.

@LaurentBerger
Copy link

LaurentBerger commented Dec 20, 2016

@StevenPuttemans @LorenaGdL So do I. Now I apply following rule :
1 block spammer
2 accept new user if message is about opencv
3 reject message if it is not about opencv but it's not a spam (only one message)

I think it's right.
I made a dynamic cast < comment > answer in this post http://answers.opencv.org/question/114108/opencv-310-build-failure-on-windows-10/

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

@LaurentBerger

  1. Yes block and delete content option
  2. Yes
  3. That's a bit difficult, I usually stick to 1 or 2 and let community decide if it is related or not

@LaurentBerger
Copy link

About 1-2-3 when I choose an option is it possible to go back?

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

I do not think so. Decisions are quite final unless you remember the name of the user, then you can change his account status by looking for him through accounts.

@berak
Copy link
Author

berak commented Dec 20, 2016

btw, nice to have you here, it makes such a difference ;)

@PkLab
Copy link

PkLab commented Dec 20, 2016

nice to see some fresh blood here. I Hope this might to improve some stale questions about the forum organization :-)

@sturkmen72
Copy link

hi all,
i am happy to became one of the moderators today. Hope together we contribute to a better forum environment.

@StevenPuttemans
Copy link

Welcome to the club!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants