-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Router should be accept proxy protocol on port 1936 #17619
Comments
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
@knobunc Any idea? |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
/lifecycle frozen |
I'm using on the AWS the new NLB for loadbalancing the router.
AWS supports the proxy protocol days ago. I configure the IP:1936/healthz as healthcheck.
If the target group of the loadbalancer has active proxy protocol, the healthcheck are fired with proxy protocol, too. Since the port 1936 is handeld by the openshift-router process, it must be accept the proxy protocol to response valid answers for the loadbalancer.
Version
oc version
oc v3.7.0+7ed6862
kubernetes v1.7.6+a08f5eeb62
features: Basic-Auth GSSAPI Kerberos SPNEGO
Server
openshift v3.7.0+7ed6862
kubernetes v1.7.6+a08f5eeb62
Steps To Reproduce
Current Result
After some minutes, the health status will be unhealthy
Expected Result
All Target should be healthy
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: