-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature Request]: Add Support for MLX
Frontend
#24340
Comments
Hi @NripeshN, It is quite interesting. I see it is young framework and already collected 28k stars in GitHub. Really great work! However, is there any objective reason about why research scientist and engineers will select MLX framework for training new models instead of PyTorch? We observe PyTorch to keep a trend despite some new frameworks like JAX, MindSpore made attempts to accelerate training, etc. but anyway scientists select PyTorch. That seems a fact. So our current efforts are absolutely concentrated around PyTorch models support. In the meantime, we are always open and welcome to our external contributors who want to add new frontend. We can provide more details about how to do this and support this contribution. Best regards, |
Hi @rkazants |
@NripeshN, cool! Give me some time and I will be back with instructions. Best regards, |
@NripeshN, thank you for your interest! Could you elaborate a bit on proposed workflow and technical side of the proposal? I suppose that we can catch the compute graph from MLX at the same point when |
@NripeshN any updates on the question above? |
Request Description
I am writing to propose the inclusion of support for the MLX frontend in the OpenVINO toolkit.
Issue submission checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: