Replies: 2 comments
-
Change |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
The point this is “brew extract” from the latest so it’s not written with a
version number. #{version} won’t work here because there is an @ when
version and not when latest.
…On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 1:35 PM Patrick Linnane ***@***.***> wrote:
Change bin/"switcher" to ***@***.***" if that's the binary name.
We only support the latest versions of software, so this may not work.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5366 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAFPZYOVILWDT75G36HFIVTZCTU67AVCNFSM6AAAAABHW5S3B6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM4TINRRGAZTK>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Additional Info
Output of
brew config
Output of
brew doctor
Description of issue
When I have the following in a formula it works when I am using the latest version:
However when I extra to run an older version of the formula say
0.9.1
the binary now becomes[email protected]
and the command above fails. I am looking for a way for the formula to either point properly to the correct binary or create abrew link
forswitcher
to[email protected]
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions