Skip to content

Commit d3709c4

Browse files
authored
Update 08-comparing-anker-power-packs.md
1 parent f62d72c commit d3709c4

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-1
lines changed

content/2025/07/08-comparing-anker-power-packs/08-comparing-anker-power-packs.md

Lines changed: 5 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Model | Capacity | Physical Size - fits? | Price | Passes Test | Powers down whe
3838
2Power - A08 | 5000mAh | Yes | No longer stocked | Yes | Yes
3939
Anker 321 | 5200mAh | Yes | £13.98 | Yes | Yes
4040
Anker Zolo | 10000mAh | No - 110 mm x 65 mm x 25 mm, too big | £13.99 | Yes | Power cycled!
41-
Anker Nano | 10000mAh | Yes - 85 mm x 55 mm x 35 mm | £39.99 | Yes | No
41+
Anker Nano | 10000mAh | Yes - 85 mm x 55 mm x 35 mm | £39.99 | Yes | No during test, yes when at a lower 63% though
4242
Anker 533 | 10000mAh | Yes - 100 mm x 55 mm x 25 mm | £35.99 | Yes | No
4343

4444
## Considerations on each model
@@ -80,6 +80,10 @@ It turns out that the first option worked. This could be because none of the non
8080

8181
I tried it again with the 2Power, which worked first time. Then I was able to get the Nano working with Wi-Fi. I then continiued the full rounds of testing.
8282

83+
## 2025-07-17 Update
84+
85+
The Anker Nano powered down when charging, or power cycled sometimes just like the Zolo. It behaved better under test, when nearly full, but when at a lower freshness of 63%, the Raspberry Pi was repeatedly powered off and on. So it is still not really suitable for charging while power up.
86+
8387
## Conclusion
8488

8589
{% img_responsive "content/2025/07/08-comparing-anker-power-packs/all-the-packs.jpg", "All the Anker Power Packs with the 2power", "720, 940, 1140" %}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)