Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Evaluate using Bjoern for Python (instead of uWSGI or Gunicorn) #293

Open
bittner opened this issue Mar 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Evaluate using Bjoern for Python (instead of uWSGI or Gunicorn) #293

bittner opened this issue Mar 3, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
framework:Django framework:Flask help wanted

Comments

@bittner
Copy link
Member

bittner commented Mar 3, 2022

Bjoern really seems to be the ultra-high-performance WSGI server that leaves all competitors behind.

The integration complexity is en par with Gunicorn and uWSGI. There seem to be no immediately apparent downsides (apart from missing HTTP/2 support).

Background Reading
@bittner bittner changed the title Evaluate using Bjoern for Python (instead of uWSGI oder Gunicorn) Evaluate using Bjoern for Python (instead of uWSGI or Gunicorn) Mar 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
framework:Django framework:Flask help wanted
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@bittner