In Memory Database #13
satoshi-szk
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 5 replies
-
The current implementation is optimized for concurrent transactions, which is not supported with in-memory SQLite databases. We could expose the same API without concurrency with an in-memory database, but that would require some work. Can investigate that for a future release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
5 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, thank you for your great library.
I am really happy because I was looking for a library that would manage Isolate and allow concurrent transactions.
Anyway, I often use in-memory databases for unit testing. I think it will be useful for many people.
The sqlite3 library has a method
sqlite3.openInMemory()
available; the SqliteDatabase class in sqlite_async does not appear to have such an option.Please let me know if I am just missing something that is already implemented.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions