You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some normal fields require assumptions for flipping their direction: for example, reading/writing a heat flux, or reading/writing a normal velocity (mainly interesting in 1D-3D flow coupling).
We need to ensure that adapters follow the same assumption. For example, that writing is outgoing, and reading is incoming (and does the flipping).
Alternatively, we could make the flipping a configuration option for the respective fields (related to #36 and the schema).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We could also do both: Define a standard and make it configurable.
It also makes somehow sense to me that:
writing assumes an outward normal vector
reading assumes an inward normal vector
Side note: There is a mathematical convention that the normal vector is typically pointing outward. So writing would be as expected, where reading feels like flipping the sign.
Could look as follows
interfaces:
- mesh_name: Fluid-Meshwrite_data:
- name: Force
- normal-direction: outwards # the default for write data
Some normal fields require assumptions for flipping their direction: for example, reading/writing a heat flux, or reading/writing a normal velocity (mainly interesting in 1D-3D flow coupling).
We need to ensure that adapters follow the same assumption. For example, that writing is outgoing, and reading is incoming (and does the flipping).
Alternatively, we could make the flipping a configuration option for the respective fields (related to #36 and the schema).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: