Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Instascale: Use configmap or similar instead of machineset template for machinesets which can be provisioned #73

Open
Tracked by #174
dimakis opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
Tracked by #174

Instascale: Use configmap or similar instead of machineset template for machinesets which can be provisioned #73

dimakis opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@dimakis

Comments

@dimakis
Copy link
Contributor

dimakis commented May 30, 2023

The current methodology for supplying machine types to be used with Instascale is by adding a machineset template. It may be a better UX to instead define these machine types in a configmap.
@dimakis dimakis converted this from a draft issue May 30, 2023
@dimakis dimakis changed the title Use configmap or similar instead of machineset template for machinesets which can be provisioned Instascale: Use configmap or similar instead of machineset template for machinesets which can be provisioned May 30, 2023
@VanillaSpoon VanillaSpoon mentioned this issue Nov 10, 2023
Open
8 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@dimakis dimakis

Labels
None yet
Projects
Project CodeFlare Sprint Board
Status: Todo
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@dimakis