You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not 100% sure that this is a bug, I might be overlooking something on the math side. That said, I find it odd that the following example works with uniform_prior variable values of 1, 10, 1000, and 10000, but not with the value of 100.
Does anything change if you use 100.0 (float) instead of integer 100?
Yes, it starts working with uniform_prior=100. float specification. As this is lab code, I'm happy to just update it to use floats for priors as a workaround. Thank you!
Describe the issue:
I'm not 100% sure that this is a bug, I might be overlooking something on the math side. That said, I find it odd that the following example works with
uniform_prior
variable values of1
,10
,1000
, and10000
, but not with the value of100
.Reproduceable code example:
Error message:
PyMC version information:
Installed
pymc
viauv
. M1 Mac, Python3.13.2 (main, Feb 4 2025, 14:51:09) [Clang 16.0.0 (clang-1600.0.26.6)]
,pymc==5.20.1
,pytensor==2.27.1
.Context for the issue:
I was looking to set up some evaluations for data sampled through a TS bandit, that's how I got my initial numbers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: