Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

starsdata not available, stars fails revdeps. #684

Open
rsbivand opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

starsdata not available, stars fails revdeps. #684

rsbivand opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@rsbivand
Copy link
Member

rsbivand commented Apr 25, 2024

With GDAL 3.9.0 Beta1 I get:

00check.log

Is this a starsdata (version?) problem? I tried reinstalling but the prime site is down:

> install.packages("starsdata", repos = "http://gis-bigdata.uni-muenster.de/pebesma")
Installing package into '/home/rsb/lib/r_libs'
(as 'lib' is unspecified)
Warning: unable to access index for repository http://gis-bigdata.uni-muenster.de/pebesma/src/contrib:
  cannot open URL 'http://gis-bigdata.uni-muenster.de/pebesma/src/contrib/PACKAGES'
Warning message:
package 'starsdata' is not available for this version of R

A version of this package for your version of R might be available elsewhere,
see the ideas at
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-patched/R-admin.html#Installing-packages 
@edzer
Copy link
Member

edzer commented Apr 25, 2024

install.packages("starsdata", repos = "http://cran.uni-muenster.de/pebesma")

should do it and you may need to set options(timeout = 600) or so.

@rsbivand
Copy link
Member Author

Trying from http://pebesma.staff.ifgi.de now, still 0.0-1 there. On http://cran.uni-muenster.de/pebesma the version is 0.0-2, so I'll report back when that installs. The example may need a version check on the package, as the No such file or directory suggests that the file used is not present in 0.0-1. The package is also larger, 1058.4 MB download, as against 1037.4 MB for 0.0-1.

@rsbivand
Copy link
Member Author

Of the initial 16 errors on ~ 900 sf and terra packages, most were unprotected suggests, re-running those failures now after installing the suggested packages that should have been conditioned. My R_LIBS now > 4500.

@edzer
Copy link
Member

edzer commented Apr 25, 2024

For me it checked clean under gdal 3.9.0beta1.

@rsbivand
Copy link
Member Author

rsbivand commented Apr 25, 2024

Good, I expect it will for me too, but I had starsdata_0.0-1 installed; with 0.0-2:
00check.log

@rsbivand
Copy link
Member Author

Only remaining issues:
ropensci/osmextract#291
PredictiveEcology/SpaDES.core#275

of which only the former may be related to the GDAL version (if it is now checking better than before).

@achubaty
Copy link

PredictiveEcology/SpaDES.core#275 has been resolved with v2.0.5 just accepted to CRAN

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants