You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The image size is passed as a parameter already, and can be found by hovering over the gear icon. For now it would be a column of 640, so it wouldn't be very useful.
I agree with the FLOPS, as it would show computational complexity of the model and may differ from model size.
Is there a way to estimate FLOPS dynamically? If not, this is something to be added to MODEL_DICT in each run.py file. In some cases MODEL_IDS would needs to be refactored to MODEL_DICT.
Is that something you'd like to help us with, @kostum123?
The image size is passed as a parameter already, and can be found by hovering over the gear icon. For now it would be a column of 640, so it wouldn't be very useful.
I agree with the FLOPS, as it would show computational complexity of the model and may differ from model size.
Is there a way to estimate FLOPS dynamically? If not, this is something to be added to MODEL_DICT in each run.py file. In some cases MODEL_IDS would needs to be refactored to MODEL_DICT.
Is that something you'd like to help us with, @kostum123?
Sadly, I don't have the compute resources to measure and update it for all models.
I think this will be nice addition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: