Tracking issue for "clarified ADT kinds" (RFC 1506) #35626
Description
Tracking issue for rust-lang/rfcs#1506.
Status:
Fully stabilized.
Stabilized by PR #41145:
- Numeric fields in struct expressions/patterns S { 0: a, 1: b } are not yet stabilized.
- We've decided to stabilize the existing support, but we're still in need of a PR. If you're interested in contributing, directions for stabilizing this feature can be found here.
Stabilized by PR #36868:
- Lifted restrictions on tuple structs/variants are stabilized, i.e. S{..} can be used with any structs and empty tuple structs are permitted without feature gate.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.Relevant to the language teamIn the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised.
Type
Projects
Milestone
Relationships
Development
No branches or pull requests
Participants
Activity
Auto merge of #35138 - petrochenkov:clarify, r=eddyb
nikomatsakis commentedon Oct 4, 2016
@rfcbot fcp merge
I propose that we stabilize this feature. There are no known blockers or interactions and it is a relatively minor extension to existing syntax. I would very much welcome the ability to use
{}more consistently.rfcbot commentedon Oct 4, 2016
FCP proposed with disposition to merge. Review requested from:
No concerns currently listed.
See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.
rfcbot commentedon Oct 13, 2016
All relevant subteam members have reviewed. No concerns remain.
rfcbot commentedon Oct 20, 2016
It has been one week since all blocks to the FCP were resolved.
nikomatsakis commentedon Oct 21, 2016
Entering FCP. Honestly I'm not clear for how long. =) Stabilizations still confuse me a bit.
nikomatsakis commentedon Nov 2, 2016
The release is coming up, and this has not exactly been a controversial topic, so we've decide to make it official and approve this for stabilization.
Rollup merge of rust-lang#36868 - petrochenkov:adtstab, r=nikomatsakis
24 remaining items
aturon commentedon Mar 15, 2017
cc @petrochenkov @rust-lang/compiler -- anyone want to make a quick stabilization PR that we can backport to 1.17 beta?
nikomatsakis commentedon Mar 16, 2017
Stabilization is a great place for a first PR. There are directions available on the forge:
https://forge.rust-lang.org/stabilization-guide.html
Marking this as E-easy and E-mentor.
nikomatsakis commentedon Mar 16, 2017
Ah, an important question -- has this been documented? If so, we ought to do that first.
steveklabnik commentedon Mar 16, 2017
I do not believe so.
Auto merge of #41145 - matthewjasper:stabilize-relaxed-adts, r=petroc…
est31 commentedon Jun 28, 2017
cc #42945