-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
Closed
Labels
B-RFC-approvedBlocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.B-unstableBlocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.E-easyCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.E-mentorCall for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.T-langRelevant to the language teamRelevant to the language teamfinal-comment-periodIn the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised.In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised.
Description
Tracking issue for rust-lang/rfcs#1506.
Status:
Fully stabilized.
Stabilized by PR #41145:
- Numeric fields in struct expressions/patterns S { 0: a, 1: b } are not yet stabilized.
- We've decided to stabilize the existing support, but we're still in need of a PR. If you're interested in contributing, directions for stabilizing this feature can be found here.
To pick up a draggable item, press the space bar. While dragging, use the arrow keys to move the item. Press space again to drop the item in its new position, or press escape to cancel.To pick up a draggable item, press the space bar. While dragging, use the arrow keys to move the item. Press space again to drop the item in its new position, or press escape to cancel.
Stabilized by PR #36868:
- Lifted restrictions on tuple structs/variants are stabilized, i.e. S{..} can be used with any structs and empty tuple structs are permitted without feature gate.To pick up a draggable item, press the space bar. While dragging, use the arrow keys to move the item. Press space again to drop the item in its new position, or press escape to cancel.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
B-RFC-approvedBlocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.Blocker: Approved by a merged RFC but not yet implemented.B-unstableBlocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable.E-easyCall for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.Call for participation: Easy difficulty. Experience needed to fix: Not much. Good first issue.E-mentorCall for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.Call for participation: This issue has a mentor. Use #t-compiler/help on Zulip for discussion.T-langRelevant to the language teamRelevant to the language teamfinal-comment-periodIn the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised.In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised.
Type
Projects
Milestone
Relationships
Development
Select code repository
Activity
Auto merge of #35138 - petrochenkov:clarify, r=eddyb
nikomatsakis commentedon Oct 4, 2016
@rfcbot fcp merge
I propose that we stabilize this feature. There are no known blockers or interactions and it is a relatively minor extension to existing syntax. I would very much welcome the ability to use
{}
more consistently.rfcbot commentedon Oct 4, 2016
FCP proposed with disposition to merge. Review requested from:
No concerns currently listed.
See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.
rfcbot commentedon Oct 13, 2016
All relevant subteam members have reviewed. No concerns remain.
rfcbot commentedon Oct 20, 2016
It has been one week since all blocks to the FCP were resolved.
nikomatsakis commentedon Oct 21, 2016
Entering FCP. Honestly I'm not clear for how long. =) Stabilizations still confuse me a bit.
nikomatsakis commentedon Nov 2, 2016
The release is coming up, and this has not exactly been a controversial topic, so we've decide to make it official and approve this for stabilization.
Rollup merge of rust-lang#36868 - petrochenkov:adtstab, r=nikomatsakis
24 remaining items
aturon commentedon Mar 15, 2017
cc @petrochenkov @rust-lang/compiler -- anyone want to make a quick stabilization PR that we can backport to 1.17 beta?
nikomatsakis commentedon Mar 16, 2017
Stabilization is a great place for a first PR. There are directions available on the forge:
https://forge.rust-lang.org/stabilization-guide.html
Marking this as E-easy and E-mentor.
nikomatsakis commentedon Mar 16, 2017
Ah, an important question -- has this been documented? If so, we ought to do that first.
steveklabnik commentedon Mar 16, 2017
I do not believe so.
Auto merge of #41145 - matthewjasper:stabilize-relaxed-adts, r=petroc…
est31 commentedon Jun 28, 2017
cc #42945