-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
Add safety critical survey #384
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
PLeVasseur
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, thanks @Kobzol for pulling this together!
I left a few suggestions for additions.
Tagging @MerrimanInd for visibility and discussion before the suggestions are accepted.
|
|
||
| Columns: | ||
|
|
||
| - Would unblock development |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is "will commit resources" a too strong ask for this little context provided? When filling this survey I would think that I would commit resources, provided the work will meet what I need.
(same comment also for the other question)
apiraino
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left some comments/questions mostly because I don't know the discussion behind this survey...
|
|
||
| Columns: | ||
|
|
||
| - Would unblock development |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is "will commit resources" a too strong ask for this little context provided? When filling this survey I would think that I would commit resources, provided the work will meet what I need.
(same comment also for the other question)
| @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | |||
| # Rust Language & Ecosystem for Safety-Critical: Project Goals 2026 | |||
|
|
|||
| Hey there! Thanks for taking the time for this survey. Please provide your feedback on those things, which, if available would improve the ability for your company to use the Rust programming language in a safety-critical context. We will use your feedback to inform which Rust Project Goal(s) the Safety-Critical Rust Consortium should propose for 2026. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess this is a first draft, but this intro text could use some improvement. For example:
- who is the target audience for this survey?
- can we rephrase "those things" into something more specific, like "platform support", "features" or anything else this survey is intended to guage interest for?
- what is the "Safety-Critical Rust Consortium"? Maybe a few links and context could help
- What is the promise here? Will the most-wanted features be set for a project goal 2026 and resources allocated? Or is it just guaging interest?
- Will there be a blog post or some kind of summary with the results?
- Until when will this poll run?
- (... probably other things I forgot ...)
(I am not in the discussion loop about this survey so maybe I am missing some context)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @apiraino -- fair feedback. Will refine.
|
|
||
| Type: free form | ||
|
|
||
| ### Which of the following Rust language features, if available, would improve the ability for you to use the Rust programming language in safety-critical software development? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume all the following options are concepts very familiar to the target audience. In case they're not maybe a few links explaining what they are might be useful. If there are open issues or RFCs they could be useful as well.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @apiraino 👋 fair that not much context is here. We plan to add links for the items, still gathering them.
| - Would unblock development | ||
| - Would be good to have | ||
| - Not needed for my case | ||
| - Haven't heard of this before |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you think some readers could not have enough context about an option, would it make sense adding more context to external resources explaining what these items are?
|
|
||
| Type: free form | ||
|
|
||
| ### Your Name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
name, company and email are PII, right? So the survey results outght to be handled by Foundation?
Also: why should I give you my contact? Do you want to get back to me? If yes, then I would explicitate that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wrote out why we'd like contact info above. And correct -- the Foundation will be distributing the survey.
PLeVasseur
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A bit more refinement based on feedback received today. ✌️
|
|
||
| Columns: | ||
|
|
||
| - Would unblock development |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding two columns to help with matchmaking of "party that wants work done" and "party willing to fund"
| - Would unblock development | |
| - Would contribute engineering | |
| - Would contribute financially | |
| - Would unblock development |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's good to add these options here, because they are no longer mutually exclusive. What if my company wants to both contribute engineering, financially, and it would unblock my use-case? I would create another question for this.
|
|
||
| Columns: | ||
|
|
||
| - Would unblock development |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding two columns to help with matchmaking of "party that wants work done" and "party willing to fund"
| - Would unblock development | |
| - Would contribute engineering | |
| - Would contribute financially | |
| - Would unblock development |
|
|
||
| Type: free form | ||
|
|
||
| ### Which of the following Rust language features, if available, would improve the ability for you to use the Rust programming language in safety-critical software development? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @apiraino 👋 fair that not much context is here. We plan to add links for the items, still gathering them.
| @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ | |||
| # Rust Language & Ecosystem for Safety-Critical: Project Goals 2026 | |||
|
|
|||
| Hey there! Thanks for taking the time for this survey. Please provide your feedback on those things, which, if available would improve the ability for your company to use the Rust programming language in a safety-critical context. We will use your feedback to inform which Rust Project Goal(s) the Safety-Critical Rust Consortium should propose for 2026. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @apiraino -- fair feedback. Will refine.
|
|
||
| Type: free form | ||
|
|
||
| ### Your Name |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wrote out why we'd like contact info above. And correct -- the Foundation will be distributing the survey.
As requested by @PLeVasseur.