@@ -41,14 +41,16 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category.
41
41
### Project/Tooling Updates
42
42
43
43
### Observations/Thoughts
44
-
44
+ * [ Evolution of Rust compiler errors] ( https://kobzol.github.io/rust/rustc/2025/05/16/evolution-of-rustc-errors.html )
45
+ * [ For your eyes only] ( https://bitfieldconsulting.com/posts/for-your-eyes-only )
45
46
* [ Disable debuginfo to improve Rust compile times] ( https://kobzol.github.io/rust/rustc/2025/05/20/disable-debuginfo-to-improve-rust-compile-times.html )
46
47
47
48
### Rust Walkthroughs
48
49
49
50
### Research
50
51
51
52
### Miscellaneous
53
+ * [ Scanner- The Team Accelerating Log Analysis With Rust] ( https://filtra.io/rust/interviews/scanner-may-25 )
52
54
53
55
## Crate of the Week
54
56
@@ -59,29 +61,16 @@ and just ask the editors to select the category.
59
61
[ submit_crate ] : https://users.rust-lang.org/t/crate-of-the-week/2704
60
62
61
63
## Calls for Testing
62
-
63
64
An important step for RFC implementation is for people to experiment with the
64
- implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization. The following
65
- RFCs would benefit from user testing before moving forward:
66
-
67
- <!-- Calls for Testing go here, use this format:
68
- * [<RFC Topic>](<RFC URL>)
69
- * [Tracking Issue](<Tracking Issue URL>)
70
- * [Testing steps](<Testing Steps URL>)
71
- -->
72
- <!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
73
- <!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
74
- <!-- Remember to remove the `call-for-testing` label from the RFC so that the maintainer can signal for testers again, if desired. -->
75
-
76
- ### [ RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing )
65
+ implementation and give feedback, especially before stabilization.
77
66
78
- ### [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing )
67
+ If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear in this list, add a
68
+ ` call-for-testing ` label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or
69
+ guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature need testing.
79
70
80
- ### [ Rustup] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing )
81
-
82
- If you are a feature implementer and would like your RFC to appear on the above list, add the new ` call-for-testing `
83
- label to your RFC along with a comment providing testing instructions and/or guidance on which aspect(s) of the feature
84
- need testing.
71
+ * * No calls for testing were issued this week by [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/call-for-testing ) ,
72
+ [ Rust language RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues?q=label%3Acall-for-testing ) or
73
+ [ Rustup] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/labels/call-for-testing ) .*
85
74
86
75
## Call for Participation; projects and speakers
87
76
@@ -115,54 +104,57 @@ If you are an event organizer hoping to expand the reach of your event, please s
115
104
116
105
### Rust Compiler Performance Triage
117
106
118
- <!-- Perf results go here -->
107
+ A relatively quiet week, likely caused by not that many PRs being merged as many contributors
108
+ were at RustWeek and the All Hands event. There were several nice wins in trait solving;
109
+ the benchmark suite now contains benchmarks that use the new trait solver, so we can now
110
+ focus on optimizing its performance in the near future.
111
+
112
+ Triage done by ** @kobzol ** .
113
+
114
+ Revision range: [ 718ddf66..59372f2c] ( https://perf.rust-lang.org/?start=718ddf660e6a1802c39b4962cf7eaa4db57025ef&end=59372f2c81ba74554d9a71b12a4ed7f29adb33a2&absolute=false&stat=instructions%3Au )
115
+
116
+ ** Summary** :
117
+ | (instructions: u ) | mean | range | count |
118
+ | :----------------------------------:| :-----:| :--------------:| :-----:|
119
+ | Regressions ❌ <br /> (primary) | 0.6% | [ 0.1%, 1.8%] | 25 |
120
+ | Regressions ❌ <br /> (secondary) | 0.9% | [ 0.1%, 3.1%] | 23 |
121
+ | Improvements ✅ <br /> (primary) | -0.3% | [ -0.6%, -0.1%] | 33 |
122
+ | Improvements ✅ <br /> (secondary) | -2.2% | [ -9.2%, -0.1%] | 26 |
123
+ | All ❌✅ (primary) | 0.1% | [ -0.6%, 1.8%] | 58 |
124
+
125
+ 2 Regressions, 5 Improvements, 3 Mixed; 3 of them in rollups
126
+ 41 artifact comparisons made in total
127
+
128
+ [ Full report here] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/blob/07f51987e0e9ca879a542ff365a4bac82d9c66f6/triage/2025-05-20.md ) .
119
129
120
130
### [ Approved RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/commits/master )
121
131
122
132
Changes to Rust follow the Rust [ RFC (request for comments) process] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs#rust-rfcs ) . These
123
133
are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:
124
134
125
- <!-- Approved RFCs go here, use this format: * [Topic](URL) -->
126
- <!-- or if none were approved this week, use: * *No RFCs were approved this week.* -->
127
- <!-- * []() -->
128
-
129
- <!--
130
- ### [Approved Major Change Proposals (MCP)](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html)
131
- <!~~ MCPs occur infrequently, so this section is commented out by default. ~~>
132
- <!~~ MCPs which have been approved or rejected this week go here, use this format: * [major change accepted|rejected] [Topic](URL) ~~>
133
- -->
135
+ * * No RFCs were approved this week.*
134
136
135
137
### Final Comment Period
136
138
137
139
Every week, [ the team] ( https://www.rust-lang.org/team.html ) announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs
138
140
which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.
139
141
140
- #### [ RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period )
141
- <!-- RFCs which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
142
- <!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: * *No RFCs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
143
- <!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
144
-
145
142
#### Tracking Issues & PRs
146
- <!-- Tracking Issues which have entered FCP go here, use this format: * [disposition: merge|close] [Topic](URL) -->
147
- <!-- or if none entered FCP this week, use: -->
148
- <!-- * *No Tracking Issues or PRs entered Final Comment Period this week.* -->
149
- <!-- * [disposition: ] []() -->
150
-
151
143
##### [ Rust] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
144
+ * [ Tracking Issue for AVX512 intrinsics] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111137 )
145
+ * [ rustdoc: on mobile, make the sidebar full width and linewrap] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139831 )
152
146
153
- ##### [ Cargo] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
154
-
155
- ##### [ Language Team] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+ )
156
-
157
- ##### [ Language Reference] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
147
+ * No Items entered Final Comment Period this week for
148
+ [ Cargo] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) ,
149
+ [ Rust RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/labels/final-comment-period ) ,
150
+ [ Language Reference] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) ,
151
+ [ Language Team] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc+ ) or
152
+ [ Unsafe Code Guidelines] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc ) .*
158
153
159
- ##### [ Unsafe Code Guidelines ] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Afinal-comment-period+sort%3Aupdated-desc )
154
+ Let us know if you would like your PRs, Tracking Issues or RFCs to be tracked as a part of this list.
160
155
161
156
#### [ New and Updated RFCs] ( https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pulls )
162
- <!-- New or updated RFCs go here, use this format: * [new|updated] [Topic](URL) -->
163
- <!-- or if there are no new or updated RFCs this week, use: -->
164
- <!-- * *No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.* -->
165
- <!-- * [new|updated] []() -->
157
+ * * No New or Updated RFCs were created this week.*
166
158
167
159
## Upcoming Events
168
160
0 commit comments