-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 783
Testing Abilities
It can be difficult to thoroughly test user permissions at the functional/integration level because there are often many branching possibilities. Since CanCan handles all permission logic in a single Ability
class this makes it easy to have a solid set of unit test for complete coverage.
The can?
method can be called directly on any Ability
(like you would in the controller or view) so it is easy to test permission logic.
test "user can only destroy projects which he owns" do
user = User.create!
ability = Ability.new(user)
assert ability.can?(:destroy, Project.new(:user => user))
assert ability.cannot?(:destroy, Project.new)
end
If you are testing the Ability
class through RSpec there is a be_able_to
matcher available. This checks if the can?
method returns true
.
require "cancan/matchers"
# ...
ability.should be_able_to(:destroy, Project.new(:user => user))
ability.should_not be_able_to(:destroy, Project.new)
Pro way ;)
require "cancan/matchers"
# ...
describe "User" do
describe "abilities" do
subject { ability }
let(:ability){ Ability.new(user) }
let(:user){ nil }
context "when is an account manager" do
let(:user){ Factory(:accounts_manager) }
it{ should be_able_to(:manage, Account.new) }
end
end
end
Custom matcher, make test code more sense:
# e.g.:
# @user.should have_ability(:create, for: Post.new)
# @user.should have_ability([:create, :read], for: Post.new)
# @user.should have_ability({create: true, read: false, update: false, destroy: true}, for: Post.new)
RSpec::Matchers.define :have_ability do |ability_hash, options = {}|
match do |user|
ability = Ability.new(user)
target = options[:for]
@ability_result = {}
ability_hash = {ability_hash => true} if ability_hash.is_a? Symbol # e.g.: :create => {:create => true}
ability_hash = ability_hash.inject({}){|_, i| _.merge({i=>true}) } if ability_hash.is_a? Array # e.g.: [:create, :read] => {:create=>true, :read=>true}
ability_hash.each do |action, true_or_false|
@ability_result[action] = ability.can?(action, target)
end
!ability_hash.diff(@ability_result).any?
end
failure_message_for_should do |user|
ability_hash,options = expected
ability_hash = {ability_hash => true} if ability_hash.is_a? Symbol # e.g.: :create
ability_hash = ability_hash.inject({}){|_, i| _.merge({i=>true}) } if ability_hash.is_a? Array # e.g.: [:create, :read] => {:create=>true, :read=>true}
target = options[:for]
message = "expected User:#{user} to have ability:#{ability_hash} for #{target}, but actual result is #{@ability_result}"
end
end
By default, Cucumber will ignore the rescue_from
call in the ApplicationController
and report the CanCan::AccessDenied
exception when running the features. If you want full integration testing you can change this behavior so the exception is caught by Rails. You can do so by setting this in the env.rb
file.
# in features/support/env.rb
ActionController::Base.allow_rescue = true
Alternatively, if you don't want to allow rescue on everything, you can tag individual scenarios with @allow-rescue
tag.
@allow-rescue
Scenario: Update Article
Here the rescue_from
block will take effect only in this scenario.
If you want to test authorization functionality at the controller level one option is to log-in the user who has the appropriate permissions.
user = User.create!(:admin => true) # I recommend a factory for this
session[:user_id] = user.id # log in user however you like, alternatively stub `current_user` method
get :index
assert_template :index # render the template since he should have access
Alternatively, if you want to test the controller behavior independently from what is inside the Ability
class, it is easy to stub out the ability with any behavior you want.
def setup
@ability = Object.new
@ability.extend(CanCan::Ability)
@controller.stubs(:current_ability).returns(@ability)
end
test "render index if have read ability on project" do
@ability.can :read, Project
get :index
assert_template :index
end
If you have very complex permissions it can lead to many branching possibilities. If these are all tested in the controller layer then it can lead to slow and bloated tests. Instead I recommend keeping controller authorization tests light and testing the authorization functionality more thoroughly in the Ability model through unit tests as shown at the top.
This project is abandoned, see its successor: CanCanCan