Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve visualization for subnets and nameservers #3998

Open
remyleone opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Improve visualization for subnets and nameservers #3998

remyleone opened this issue Jul 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug dedibox Dedibox issues, bugs and feature requests priority:medium Improvements that are not the main priority

Comments

@remyleone
Copy link
Member

remyleone commented Jul 23, 2024

When I got several nameservers and a subnet inside my IPv6 prefix, the rendering could be improved:

$ scw dedibox ipv6-block get
ID                          3622
Address                     2001:bc8:3010::
Duid                        00:03:00:01:2e:b3:0a:82:7d:57
Nameservers.0               example.com
Nameservers.1               foo.com
Nameservers.2               bar.com
Nameservers.3               foobar.com
Nameservers.4               barfoo.com
Cidr                        48
Subnets.0.ID                46572
Subnets.0.Address           2001:bc8:3010:100::
Subnets.0.Duid              00:03:00:01:9b:be:69:36:41:10
Subnets.0.Cidr              56
Subnets.0.DelegationStatus  unknown_status
DelegationStatus            updating
@remyleone remyleone added bug priority:medium Improvements that are not the main priority dedibox Dedibox issues, bugs and feature requests labels Jul 23, 2024
@remyleone remyleone changed the title Improve visualization for subnets Improve visualization for subnets and nameservers Jul 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug dedibox Dedibox issues, bugs and feature requests priority:medium Improvements that are not the main priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants