-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document branch protection to our repos #196
Comments
I'm pretty sure we'll end up splitting this, but I'm not sure how and where. |
We can't remove direct push access without removing our ability to fix broken merge-ups. |
We moved all the implementation details to a separate card. |
@maxime-rainville to "discuss with CISO" about confluence pages, and to determine what the policy should be for making and documenting exceptions for the documented process. |
I've email CISO with an update. I think the follow up point can be handled with the follow other cards. |
As the Silverstripe CMS product owner, I want to restrain the ability of all individuals to direct push commits or tags to our supported module repos to minimise the risk of unreviewed code changes making it to our codebase.
Acceptance criteria
Documentation and process
PRs
After merging, assign to Max to discuss updating confluence with CISO, and to decide what the specific process is for exceptions to the documented rules.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: