-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DIOT(CPCI) version of Kasli SOC #76
Comments
Let's do this. |
We'll probably take a lot from DIOT System Board (
https://ohwr.org/project/diot-sb-zu/).
śr., 11 paź 2023, 23:12 użytkownik Robert Jördens ***@***.***>
napisał:
… Let's do this.
Could you propose a rough block diagram or schematic sketch that we can
iterate on?
Is there no OHWR/CERN DIOT system board with a SoC that we could align
with?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#76 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF3AQXELNIJUNBGJNCL66TTX64DSLANCNFSM6AAAAAA54JRRYY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
We will only replace EEM connectors with CPCIS ones and use bigger FPGA. Rest remains the same. |
Having reviewed the DIOT sys board it looks like we can take it as is. |
... especially if the planned changes for v3 land (RJ45 to PS, USB for JTAG/I2C etc). |
The Kasli SOC with DIOT adapter resembles Frankenstein creation and has several limitations (not enough LVDS pairs). For this reason we will develop native KASLI SOC DIOT board.
The idea is to use bigger 7 Series SoC with enough pins to support 8 x 16 DIOT peripherals. Rest remains the same.
This will keep compatibility with existing Kasli.
Or, shall we implement some extra features?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: