You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we admit that time-representing value can wrap-around with time. In this case, if certain time period is relatively small (less than 1/2 of time counter cycle), time point represented as 0xF0 is rather before than that represented as 0x01; respectively, simple comparison 0x01 < 0xF0 will rather be misleading. One way to address this problem is to (1) reserve value 0xFF to denote "infinite future"; (2) assume that measured intervals are less than 1/2 of time counter period; and (3) compare values based on their difference in GF(time counter period) rather than based on their correspondence as integers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we admit that time-representing value can wrap-around with time. In this case, if certain time period is relatively small (less than 1/2 of time counter cycle), time point represented as 0xF0 is rather before than that represented as 0x01; respectively, simple comparison 0x01 < 0xF0 will rather be misleading. One way to address this problem is to (1) reserve value 0xFF to denote "infinite future"; (2) assume that measured intervals are less than 1/2 of time counter period; and (3) compare values based on their difference in GF(time counter period) rather than based on their correspondence as integers
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: