You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Optimizers may work better if they are stateful. For example, an optimizer that works on a weighted average of metrics may cope better with fluctuations than a stateless optimizer.
The current structure is not amenable to a stateful optimizer. Previous EvaluatorParameters are not stored by the Orchestrator. The Orchestrator may also skip calls to optimize (when another optimization is ongoing), so it's not possible for the Optimizer to store all EvaluatorParameters either. Thus, we'll have to define a new structure when implementing a stateful optimizer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@bgchun commented that we need to introduce hysteresis, and avoid applying optimization when the estimated cost is not that beneficial. For this, we need to track the history of the cost in somewhere like Optimizer or OptimizationOrchestrator.
Optimizers may work better if they are stateful. For example, an optimizer that works on a weighted average of metrics may cope better with fluctuations than a stateless optimizer.
The current structure is not amenable to a stateful optimizer. Previous EvaluatorParameters are not stored by the Orchestrator. The Orchestrator may also skip calls to
optimize
(when another optimization is ongoing), so it's not possible for the Optimizer to store all EvaluatorParameters either. Thus, we'll have to define a new structure when implementing a stateful optimizer.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: