Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pagerduty docs not in line with current behaviour #493

Open
wilb opened this issue Jun 1, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Pagerduty docs not in line with current behaviour #493

wilb opened this issue Jun 1, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation hacktoberfest An issue highlighted for the digital ocean Hacktoberfest Event

Comments

@wilb
Copy link
Contributor

wilb commented Jun 1, 2016

Historically, the Pagerduty integration used to "just work" when you used added the pagerduty recipe to your run list and set your API key as an attribute. I've got a box I provisioned a few years ago that is still using an old version of the cookbook that still behaves like this

Having just spun up a new host using the latest cookbook it appears that this behaviour has changed, but the documentation doesn't reflect this. The pagerduty user still gets created but no longer gets added to the admin users group by default (I assume this is now intentional). I've also created a nagios_pagerduty databag and specifically created a "pagerduty_crit" contact with "admin_contactgroup" set to true but this also didn't add that user to the admin contactgroup either...

Overriding the admin group via nagios_contractroups to manually add the pagerduty user replicates the old behaviour, but maybe the documentation should be updated to better reflect the current behaviour?

@wilb
Copy link
Contributor Author

wilb commented Jun 1, 2016

#288 seems to refer to the admin_contactgroup issue.

@damacus
Copy link
Member

damacus commented Jun 15, 2017

Any way you'd like to submit a PR for this issue?

Is so that'd be greeeeat.

@github-actions
Copy link

Marking stale due to inactivity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days. Alternatively drop by the #sous-chefs channel on the Chef Community Slack and we'll be happy to help! Thanks, Sous-Chefs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Sep 30, 2020
@xorimabot xorimabot removed the Stale label Sep 30, 2020
@ramereth ramereth added Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation hacktoberfest An issue highlighted for the digital ocean Hacktoberfest Event labels Oct 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Improvements or additions to documentation hacktoberfest An issue highlighted for the digital ocean Hacktoberfest Event
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants