Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider reusing hickory_proto::rr::record_data::RData instead of own DnsRecord type #9

Open
jcgruenhage opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Consider reusing hickory_proto::rr::record_data::RData instead of own DnsRecord type #9

jcgruenhage opened this issue Oct 4, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jcgruenhage
Copy link

The DnsRecord type included in this crate is less complete than the type included in hickory_proto. Reusing the type of hickory instead (which is already a dependency anyway) would allow for less code and still more complete support.
jcgruenhage added a commit to jcgruenhage/dns-update that referenced this issue Oct 22, 2024
@jcgruenhage
Reuse more hickory_proto types
1a25fbc 
Fixes stalwartlabs#9
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jcgruenhage