diff --git a/SearchIn2dMatrix.java b/SearchIn2dMatrix.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..8afb297e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/SearchIn2dMatrix.java
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+// Time Complexity : O(log m*n) as it's binary search on the complete matrix size.
+// Space Complexity : O(1)
+// Did this code successfully run on Leetcode : Yes
+// Any problem you faced while coding this : Not much, once the idea to consider it as a single array and perform the binary search to achieve O(log m*n) it was
+// better. The core part of the solution lies in identifying the position of mid element.
+
+// Your code here along with comments explaining your approach
+
+
+class Solution {
+    public boolean searchMatrix(int[][] matrix, int target) {
+        int low = 0;
+        int high = (matrix.length * matrix[0].length) - 1;
+        while(low <= high){
+            int mid = low + (high-low)/2;
+            int column = mid%matrix[0].length;
+            int row = mid/matrix[0].length;
+            if(matrix[row][column] == target){
+                return true;
+            }
+            if(matrix[row][column] > target){
+                high = mid - 1;
+            } else{
+                low = mid + 1;
+            }
+        }
+        return false;
+    }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/SearchInArrayReader.java b/SearchInArrayReader.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..71217a83
--- /dev/null
+++ b/SearchInArrayReader.java
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+// Time Complexity : O(log m) - m is the position of the target.
+// Space Complexity : O(1)
+// Did this code successfully run on Leetcode : Yes
+// Any problem you faced while coding this : Not much, once the idea to find the search place is cracked, it was a straight binary search on the space.
+
+// Your code here along with comments explaining your approach
+
+
+class Solution {
+    public int search(ArrayReader reader, int target) {
+        int low = 0, high = 1;
+
+        while(reader.get(high) < target){
+            low = high ;
+            high = high * 2;
+        }
+        //binary search
+        while(low <= high){
+            int mid = low + (high - low)/2;
+            if(reader.get(mid) == target) return mid;
+            if(reader.get(mid) > target){
+                high = mid - 1;
+            }else{
+                low = mid + 1;
+            }
+        }
+
+        return -1;
+    }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/SearchInRotatedArray.java b/SearchInRotatedArray.java
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..ac4bbb53
--- /dev/null
+++ b/SearchInRotatedArray.java
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+// Time Complexity : O(log n) as it's binary search.
+// Space Complexity : O(1)
+// Did this code successfully run on Leetcode : Yes
+// Any problem you faced while coding this : Not much, once the idea to find the sorted part on the array, it is a binary search to find the target.
+
+// Your code here along with comments explaining your approach
+
+
+class Solution {
+    public int search(int[] nums, int target) {
+        int low = 0;
+        int high = nums.length - 1;
+        int mid = 0;
+
+        while(low<=high){
+            mid = low + (high-low)/2;  //to avoid number overflow
+            if(nums[mid] == target){
+                return mid;
+            }
+            if(nums[low] <= nums[mid]){ // considering the left half
+                if(nums[low] <= target && nums[mid] > target){ //checking if target is in left half
+                    high = mid - 1;
+                }
+                else{
+                    low = mid + 1;
+                }
+            }else{ // considering the right half
+                if(nums[mid] < target && nums[high] >= target){
+                    low = mid + 1;
+                }else{
+                    high = mid - 1;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+        return -1;
+    }
+}
\ No newline at end of file