-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for the Timestamp issue #508
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@tankerkiller125 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThis pull request provides a migration script that updates the timestamp fields across multiple database tables to the ISO8601 format. The script modifies the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Security Recommendations
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
backend/internal/data/migrations/migrations/20250201183200_update_timestamps.sql (1)
1-4
: Clarify Migration Documentation and Backup ReminderThe header comments clearly explain that the migration converts old golang-style timestamps into the ISO8601 format. To further safeguard the process, it is recommended to document or verify that proper database backups exist before this migration is run.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
backend/internal/data/migrations/migrations/20250201183200_update_timestamps.sql
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (11)
- GitHub Check: Frontend and End-to-End Tests / Integration Tests
- GitHub Check: Backend Server Tests / Go
- GitHub Check: build (linux/arm/v7)
- GitHub Check: build (linux/arm/v7)
- GitHub Check: build (linux/arm64)
- GitHub Check: Frontend and End-to-End Tests / Lint
- GitHub Check: build (linux/arm64)
- GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
- GitHub Check: build (linux/amd64)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
backend/internal/data/migrations/migrations/20250201183200_update_timestamps.sql (12)
5-17
: Verify Timestamp Transformation for AttachmentsThe UPDATE statement for the
attachments
table uses thestrftime
function combined with substring operations to reassemble the timestamp components into ISO8601 format. Please double-check that the hard-coded substring indices (e.g., positions 1, 21, 31, and 34) align perfectly with all expected variations of the old timestamp format. Also, the WHERE clause ensures that only rows matching the specified pattern are updated.
Security Recommendation: Confirm that reliable backups are in place before executing this migration.
19-31
: Consistent Timestamp Update for Auth TokensThe transformation for the
auth_tokens
table mirrors that of theattachments
update, ensuring consistency. Make sure that both thecreated_at
andupdated_at
fields comply with the expected input format so that the substring manipulations yield valid ISO8601 strings.
Security Note: Ensure the migration is executed on a staging environment first and that backups exist.
33-45
: Review Timestamp Conversion for DocumentsThis query correctly applies the intended transformation to the
documents
table. It reassembles the timestamp by stitching together components of the original string. It is advisable to validate edge cases in which the old timestamp might slightly deviate from the assumed format.
Security Recommendation: Conduct a pre-migration data check.
47-59
: Timestamp Reformatting for Group Invitation TokensThe update statement for the
group_invitation_tokens
table follows the same logic as previous blocks. Please verify that the substring extraction and concatenation consistently produce a well-formed ISO8601 timestamp under all expected conditions.
Security Note: Maintain a rollback plan and ensure proper backups.
61-73
: Consistent Transformation Applied to GroupsThe query modifying the
groups
table adheres to the same reformatting strategy. It is important to validate that this transformation covers all variations in the old timestamps reliably.
Security Recommendation: Run this update in an environment where a backup exists in case a rollback is needed.
75-87
: Enforce Timestamp Format for Item FieldsThe update for
item_fields
employs the identical concatenation and substring logic. Ensure that the transformation is thoroughly tested for consistency across varied timestamp inputs.
Security Note: Validate the migration on a test database before applying to production.
89-101
: Validate Transformation Logic for ItemsThe query for updating the
items
table replicates the same pattern. Please double-check that every record in theitems
table has the expected old timestamp format so that the conversion does not inadvertently produce misformatted results.
Security Reminder: Confirm the existence of recent backups and a tested rollback strategy.
103-115
: Ensure Accurate Timestamp Reformatting for LabelsThe update statement for the
labels
table uses the familiar substring and concatenation method, maintaining uniformity across migrations. It’s prudent to verify that the WHERE clause adequately covers all records needing conversion.
Security Recommendation: Ensure that the migration is executed in a controlled environment with data backups.
117-129
: Check Timestamp Conversion for LocationsThis update operation for the
locations
table follows the established method. Double-check that the extracted substrings correctly represent all components of the intended ISO8601 timestamp format.
Security Note: It is advisable to perform this update during a maintenance window with confirmed backups.
131-143
: Consistent Reformatting for Maintenance EntriesThe
maintenance_entries
update reassembles timestamps in a consistent manner by reusing the substring logic. Verify that there are no off-by-one errors which could result from the fixed index positions.
Security Reminder: A validated backup procedure is essential before running such wide-reaching migrations.
145-157
: Validate Timestamp Update for NotifiersThe update block for
notifiers
applies the same well-structured transformation. As with other queries, it is important to ensure that all records targeted by the WHERE clause confirm to the expected pattern for safe conversion.
Security Recommendation: Execute pre-migration testing and ensure that data restoration measures are in place.
159-171
: Confirm Correct Timestamp Transformation for UsersThe final update statement for the
users
table completes the migration by following the same substring and concatenation process. It is recommended to verify through randomized sampling that the updated timestamps align with ISO8601 standards.
Security Note: Backup procedures and a comprehensive post-migration validation plan should be in place.
What type of PR is this?
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR resolves issues with switching to the new timestamp format for SQLITE by converting all the old golang timestamps to the standard ISO format that the new timestamp (and most SQL databases) use.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes: #484
Summary by CodeRabbit