We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
for r=0.2
200 repeats I don't know if the algo is wrong as it performs worse than EXP3 but not that worse. WDYT ?
for r=0.5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't think it can be worse. For high r it should perform the same as duplexp(r)
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
for r=0.2
![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/9783953/5561844/48bde2ec-8df7-11e4-8ee7-5658a804fbfb.png)
200 repeats
I don't know if the algo is wrong as it performs worse than EXP3 but not that worse. WDYT ?
for r=0.5
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: