Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

first figures #1

Open
judithabk6 opened this issue Dec 27, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

first figures #1

judithabk6 opened this issue Dec 27, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@judithabk6
Copy link
Collaborator

for r=0.2
image

200 repeats
I don't know if the algo is wrong as it performs worse than EXP3 but not that worse. WDYT ?

for r=0.5

@timlacroix
Copy link
Owner

I don't think it can be worse. For high r it should perform the same as
duplexp(r)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants