We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use JET to guide users to write code which targets different levels of binary staticness. Maybe error if conditions are not met.
Super duper strict mode for completely static binaries with no dynamic dispatch or allocations, and no runtime required.
Kinda strict mode: No compilation of new functions, so just linking against a minimal runtime.
Sparked by discussion with @jpsamaroo on slack
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Cool idea!
Sorry, something went wrong.
According to @tkf this PR (JuliaLang/julia#43747) can do something similar:
[It] will let the compiler verify the absence of allocation (and access to the runtime in general)
Not sure how or if they can play together. Maybe CC @aviatesk
No branches or pull requests
Use JET to guide users to write code which targets different levels of binary staticness. Maybe error if conditions are not met.
Super duper strict mode for completely static binaries with no dynamic dispatch or allocations, and no runtime required.
Kinda strict mode: No compilation of new functions, so just linking against a minimal runtime.
Sparked by discussion with @jpsamaroo on slack
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: