v6: Forms - feedback / bugs

[coliff]

Running list of feedback/bugs on v6 forms. I'll keep this listed updated.

Checkbox / Radio

• Bug: The border color is very light in light mode. I have one monitor set to be bright and an unchecked radio is pretty much invisible. (I think this is something that is planned to be improved in v5.4) Darkened recently
• Bug: Disabled checked checkbox are blue (looks broken)

Datepicker

• Enhancement: I'd like if the standard input had `maxlength="8" attribute, but also restricted user to typing in characters other than digits and /.
• Consider adding autocomplete="off" attribute - I always find it unhelpful (screenshot Edge on Windows), either in the JS code or docs suggesting adding it.

Floating Labels

• Bug: Textarea with custom heights overlaps
• Bug: Disabled textarea overlapping bug

Form Control

• Bug: the example select doesn't show the chevron icon if user has dark-mode preference but is viewing site in light mode.
• Enhancement: I think it's possible to rotate the chevron icon when select is open using a pseudo-selector. I need to check... maybe limited browser support but could be good for progressive enhancement. Could possibly be animated like the combobox.

OTP

• These are generally a little bit buggy/glitchy since the accessibility improvements PR was merged. You can't click on the next input to focus it. If you make a mistake entering and begin to re-enter a number then all preceding numbers jump down.

Range

• Enhancement: I think the current range input isn't too helpful as the 'filled' part is the same color. I think it should be enhanced with JS via an optional data-bs-range data attribute - something like this demo (original code by @louismaximepiton ! : https://code.christianoliff.com/bootstrap-6-range-meter/

Radio

• Disabled checked radios are showing as blue (looks broken)

Switch

• Disabled checked switches are showing as blue (looks broken) - see example

[crdo]

Radio/Check/Switch can be reversed via utility classes. Currently, the reversed variant has been removed and I think we should bring it back.

[mdo]

Why bring back if you say a utility can handle?

[crdo]

Well it was documented before as a supported scenario and now is not. That's all.