ambiguous definition message not giving enough suffix to disambiguate suggestions

[aryairani]

Describe and demonstrate the bug

Code in the scratch file references Cloud.run.withConfig. UCM thinks it's ambiguous, but the suggested names it offers are even more ambiguous. withConfig isn't defined in the scratch file, but is defined in multiple indirect dependencies.

  I couldn't figure out what Cloud.run.withConfig refers to here:
  
      9 | testMonotonicStaging = do Cloud.run.withConfig staging do submit default() do
  
  The name Cloud.run.withConfig is ambiguous. Its type should be: i -> (Unit ->{𝕖,
  Exception, Cloud} Text) -> Text
  
  I found some terms in scope that have matching names and types. Maybe you meant one
  of these:
  
  withConfig : ClientConfig -> (Unit ->{g, Cloud} a) ->{g, IO} a
  withConfig : ClientConfig -> (Unit ->{g, Cloud} a) ->{g, IO} a
  withConfig : ClientConfig -> (Unit ->{g, Cloud} a) ->{g, IO} a

Screenshots

Environment (please complete the following information):

• version 5bccedb

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.

[aryairani]

possibly related to #5357