-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 181
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
single shims
function calls move_to
and Getattr
#447
Comments
shims
function/decorator calls move_to
and Getattr
shims
function/decorator calls move_to
and Getattr
shims
function/decorator calls move_to
and Getattr
shims
function calls move_to
and Getattr
See #443 for reference. Tag: @anivegesana |
This construct tries to give a base definition for a function that will be or was defined differently in another version of Python or dill. Because of this, should we just call both |
I was thinking about something along those lines, yes. |
Do you do think there is any value in having a separate |
It doesn't hurt to keep them available as separate functions. |
The
@move_to
decorator must be paired with the overloading by theGetattr
later in theshims
module. It seems like with a little redesign, this could be consolidated to a single function / decorator.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: