Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

N'Ko tone marks should all be at the same height #37

Open
r12a opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

N'Ko tone marks should all be at the same height #37

r12a opened this issue Jun 15, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
doc:nkoo gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. i:glyphs Context-sensitive shaping & positioning l:nqo N'Ko script & language p:ok s:nkoo x:nkoo

Comments

@r12a
Copy link
Contributor

r12a commented Jun 15, 2023

This issue is applicable to N’Ko.

The World Organization for the Development of N'Ko prefers that all tone marks should appear at the same height above the baseline, rather than changing height according to the height of the base character to which they are attached. This image shows the preferred behaviour.

ߊ߬ߟߎ߬

More:

The GAP

The Noto Sans NKo font varies the height of the tone mark according to what it rests on. (The other major N'Ko Unicode fonts, Ebrima, Conakry, and Kigelia place tones at the same height.)

More:

Tests & results

Character app test. Install the latest Noto Sans Nko font. Open the page and select Noto Sans NKo from the 'Current font' pulldown. Test passes if both tone marks are at the same height.

Action taken

Issue, Noto

Outcomes

The latest release of the Noto N'Ko fonts now set above marks at a constant height. This means that all major N'Ko fonts now behave as expected.

Priority

Although this is the preference, the text is still readable, so this is marked as Advanced.

@r12a r12a added gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. i:glyphs Context-sensitive shaping & positioning p:advanced The gap-analysis priority is Advanced. doc:nkoo x:nkoo labels Jun 15, 2023
@r12a
Copy link
Contributor Author

r12a commented Jun 15, 2023

The first comment in this issue contains text that will automatically appear in one or more gap-analysis documents as a subsection with the same title as this issue. Any edits made to that comment will be immediately available in the Editor's draft of the document. Proposals for changes or discussion of the content can be made by adding comments below this point.

Relevant gap analysis documents include:
N'Ko

@r12a r12a added p:ok and removed p:advanced The gap-analysis priority is Advanced. labels Jun 27, 2023
@r12a r12a added s:nkoo l:nqo N'Ko script & language labels May 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
doc:nkoo gap The first comment in this issue is read by the gap-analysis document. i:glyphs Context-sensitive shaping & positioning l:nqo N'Ko script & language p:ok s:nkoo x:nkoo
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant