Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feedback email in addition to GitHub #1910

Open
shawna-slh opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Feedback email in addition to GitHub #1910

shawna-slh opened this issue Jan 15, 2025 · 4 comments

Comments

@shawna-slh
Copy link

shawna-slh commented Jan 15, 2025

PubRules currently states:

Document identifier information must be present in this order:
...
Feedback - GitHub repository issue links are required in the <dl>after <dt>Feedback:</dt> in the headers (<div class="head">) of the document. Links are expected to be of the form https://github.com/<USER_OR_ORG>/<REPO_NAME>/[issues|labels][/…].)

I propose that we also provide an email address for feedback.

Rationale: Not everyone uses GitHub. It can comes across as exclusionary if the only way to provide feedback that is listed is GitHub — which is the opposite of what we want to convey.

An example that includes email: https://www.w3.org/reports/identity-web-impact/

@deniak
Copy link
Member

deniak commented Jan 16, 2025

I think the original idea was that since the spec is being develop on GH, we want to have a central place to gather feedback instead of having comments spread all over the place. See #629 and #408.
Pubrules only checks TR documents and submissions so other types of documents don't have that requirement.

/cc @plehegar

@plehegar
Copy link
Member

Indeed, we removed the requirement several years ago because of less of our groups are using their mailing list. For those, sending an email will likely get missed.

@shawna-slh
Copy link
Author

CC: @iadawn @daniel-montalvo @ruoxiran

I understand the rationale. And I still think it's exclusionary.

For WAI docs, we will want to avoid that - and provide an email option.

Request:

Would it be OK to provide a template format to include GitHub and email, and just not make it a requirement?

draft suggestion for Feedback section that includes both:

Preferred: GitHub w3c/ai-web-impactnew issue, pull requests, open issues
If not GitHub, email: [email protected] with subject line starting “[AI-web-impact]” (archives)

Related info:

Example with email address (with wonky text formatting): https://www.w3.org/reports/identity-web-impact/

Here's an example of what we say in email announcements,:

To comment, please open a new issue in the CTAUR GitHub repository:
https://github.com/w3c/ctaur/issues/new
Please create separate GitHub issues for each topic, rather than commenting on multiple topics in a single issue.

If it's not feasible for you to use GitHub, send comments in email to: [email protected]
Please:

  • put your comments in the body of the message, not as an attachment
  • start your e-mail subject line with: [CTAUR]

@deniak
Copy link
Member

deniak commented Jan 20, 2025

Note that some groups are already using that format in the list of feedback options, e.g. https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-concepts/.

Pubrules only checks that a link to the repository issues is provided. Other ways are optional and I don't think we want/can force groups to provide a mailing list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants