You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Existing
Existing WG recharter
If this is a charter extension or revision, any issue discussion:
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach
None
Known or potential areas of concern
None
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
These specifications didn’t get enough attention from adopters. So we plan to archive these.
What it means:
Any implementation of trace context propagation via those protocols is free to use any work done in those repositories.
If specification will be resumed, there is no guarantee of continuity of these specs.
The Trace Context level 3 was intended to support propagation of trace context via response headers, integrating with the Server-Timing. This work receives very little attention and the working group is seeking adopters and contributors to help drive this conversation forward. The working group does not plan to remove this from the charter at this point, but may consider doing it in future updates.
TODO: Add a mention of OpenTelemetry in the background section since it's the most publicly notable project that makes use of the specifications produced by this group.
New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.
Charter Review
Charter
diff from charter template
diff from previous charter
chair dashboard
What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.
Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.
Communities suggested for outreach
None
Known or potential areas of concern
None
Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...)
Use this repo
Anything else we should think about as we review?
Nope
cc @SergeyKanzhelev
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: