-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fake News #54
Comments
Connections to provenance in copy/paste, in image metadata, being the default and not requiring work, would go a long way to helping fight false memes. Web annotations may have a role in fighting fake news, but have to avoid tyranny of the majority. |
Perhaps a WC3 role could be to: |
Note this from Google today. It leverages schema.org markup. |
Unclear what database Facebook is harnessing but, they too have a tagging mechanism: http://money.cnn.com/2017/04/06/media/facebook-fake-news-tool/index.html |
Just found this. I've been looking at how to leverage #5 and RDF / structured data sources, to support an array of different ways to address different issues pertaining overall to trust with media. It's important that if the world thinks the world is flat, and someone says its round; that these sorts of things in the future are not categorised as fakenews. But what's the role of W3C in this area? |
Is there some ways on calculating the creditability? based on rating feedbacks collected from crowds? |
Some TAG discussions here (raw minutes). |
Credweb CG report https://credweb.org/report/20181011 |
Discourse, accountability, blocking in social protocols.
Potential connections to provenance, annotation, identity, privacy. Conditional anonymity. Scaling problems. cf. spam, bullying.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: