re-write "zooming into a vertically scrolling page should not cause content to be hidden" #326
Labels
Comments
|
Suggestion:
|
|
Update for 2.3? |
patrickhlauke
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 19, 2021
Takes #326 (comment) as a starting point, but further clarifies the difference here between *overflowing* content (that is still reachable, but requires scrolling) and cut-off/hidden (is unreachable, basically `overflow:hidden` in CSS terms, or where scrolling has somehow been suppressed altogether) Closes #326
|
#1819 ... but i've made some further tweaks while i was there |
patrickhlauke
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
May 19, 2021
Takes #326 (comment) as a starting point, but further clarifies the difference here between *overflowing* content (that is still reachable, but requires scrolling) and cut-off/hidden (is unreachable, basically `overflow:hidden` in CSS terms, or where scrolling has somehow been suppressed altogether) Closes #326
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Understanding/reflow.html
For example, zooming into a vertically scrolling page should not cause content to be hidden to one sideThis happens by default when using pinch on a Macbook, or when using AT with Zoom functionality like Supernova etc. This because they don;'t trigger the CSS Media Query.
My suggestion would be to re-write the sentence to include the specific zoom for which this would apply, like the default browser zoom functionality.
My experience with user testing and people with low vision is that most of them don't even use browser zoom when they have AT, even so a big percentage of them do not even know about browser zoom and MQs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: