chore(docs): README reflects expanded section-number grammar (#114–#117)#118
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedPull request was closed or merged during review No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughREADME documentation describing Phase 1c-ix expansion for section-number grammar (Level 4 dotted notation and Level 5 agency suffixes). Adds milestone status, documents DOCX and plaintext parser behavior, and clarifies database constraint enforcement across the expanded section-number shape. ChangesPhase 1c-ix section-number grammar expansion
Possibly related PRs
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Summary
Section XX XX XX→Section XX XX XX[.XX[ XX]](dotted/agency suffixes are distinct identities, never truncated)spec_references.target_spec_sectionTest Plan
docs/adr/020-section-number-expanded-shape.mdresolveOut of Scope
No code changes. Pre-existing README nits unrelated to #114–#117 (e.g.
POST /parsebullet not mentioning.txt) left untouched.Summary by CodeRabbit