Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Operational Policies] Incorrect validation for allowed special characters in header values #12811

Open
tgtshanika opened this issue Mar 30, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

[Operational Policies] Incorrect validation for allowed special characters in header values #12811

tgtshanika opened this issue Mar 30, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
APIM - 4.1.0 APIM manager 4.1.0 release related issues. Feature/OperationPolicies Operation policies feature related issues Priority/Normal Type/Bug

Comments

@tgtshanika
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

When adding a new header, there is an unwanted validation in UI for allowed special characters. _ :;.,/"'?!(){}[]@<>=-+*#$&`|~^%

Screenshot 2022-03-31 at 01 37 13
@tgtshanika tgtshanika added Type/Bug Priority/Normal APIM - 4.1.0 APIM manager 4.1.0 release related issues. labels Mar 30, 2022
@tgtshanika tgtshanika changed the title [Operational Policies] Incorrect validation for allowed special characters. [Operational Policies] Incorrect validation for allowed special characters in header values Mar 30, 2022
@tgtshanika tgtshanika added the Feature/OperationPolicies Operation policies feature related issues label Mar 30, 2022
@Krishanx92
Copy link
Contributor

@ashera96 @1akshitha Any reason to add this validation?

@ashera96
Copy link
Contributor

We need to modify this validation

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
APIM - 4.1.0 APIM manager 4.1.0 release related issues. Feature/OperationPolicies Operation policies feature related issues Priority/Normal Type/Bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@tgtshanika @Krishanx92 @ashera96