Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Additional output formats for subgraph check #868

Open
InsidersByte opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Additional output formats for subgraph check #868

InsidersByte opened this issue Jun 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request internally-reviewed The issue has been reviewed internally.

Comments

@InsidersByte
Copy link

Component(s)

cli

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I want to be able to add a comment to mrs with the same content available inwgc subgraph check.

This makes it clearer what the action will be without having to go look at an individual job.

I'm using GitLab.

Describe the solution you'd like

Add a flag for alternative formats for subgraph check, either raw like the list commands and I can then build my own message or a html/markdown output that can be added directly as a comment

Describe alternatives you've considered

I've parsed the existing cli output, however it's a little complex and brittle.

Additional context

No response

@InsidersByte InsidersByte added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 17, 2024
Copy link

WunderGraph commits fully to Open Source and we want to make sure that we can help you as fast as possible.
The roadmap is driven by our customers and we have to prioritize issues that are important to them.
You can influence the priority by becoming a customer. Please contact us here.

@StarpTech StarpTech added the internally-reviewed The issue has been reviewed internally. label Jun 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request internally-reviewed The issue has been reviewed internally.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants