Skip to content

chore: audit quick-fixes — brand, deps, gitignore#122

Merged
peaktwilight merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/audit-quick-fixes
May 25, 2026
Merged

chore: audit quick-fixes — brand, deps, gitignore#122
peaktwilight merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/audit-quick-fixes

Conversation

@peaktwilight

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • Fix stale brand reference: src/research_engine/benchmarks.py line 82 used capitalized "PwnKit" (old brand) — updated to lowercase "pwnkit" (the hacking-engine project name), consistent with the rest of the codebase including docs/system/BENCHMARKS.md.
  • Add pytest-timeout to dev deps: CI installs pytest-timeout and passes --timeout=60, but it was missing from pyproject.toml. Local pytest runs now work out of the box with pip install -e '.[dev]'.
  • Gitignore MI300X placeholder: docs/results/cross-vendor-measured-mi300x.json is an untracked zeroed-out template (issue [Cross-vendor] Replace MI300X measured template with real AMD artifact #116). Added to .gitignore so it stops appearing in git status.
  • Ruff CI — skipped: Found 226 lint errors (F401: 75, E402: 53, F541: 29, F841: 25, F821: 22, etc.), well over the 50-error threshold. Recommend a dedicated cleanup PR before adding ruff to CI.

Test plan

  • pytest tests/ -x -q --timeout=60 — 913 passed, 24 skipped
  • Verify CI passes on this PR

none

- Fix stale "PwnKit" → "pwnkit" brand reference in benchmarks.py
- Add pytest-timeout to dev dependencies (CI already uses --timeout=60)
- Gitignore MI300X measured-results placeholder (issue #116)
- Skipped adding ruff to CI: 226 lint errors found, over threshold

none
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@peaktwilight, we couldn't start this review because you've used your available PR reviews for now.

Your plan includes 1 review of capacity. Refill in 29 minutes and 36 seconds.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more review capacity refills, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, review capacity refills continuously over time.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: a29c7375-d15e-4005-b87a-087d69fe3b0f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d034748 and cba8b8a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .gitignore
  • pyproject.toml
  • src/research_engine/benchmarks.py
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch chore/audit-quick-fixes

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@peaktwilight peaktwilight merged commit 9f10ea5 into main May 25, 2026
2 checks passed
@peaktwilight peaktwilight deleted the chore/audit-quick-fixes branch May 25, 2026 14:35
peaktwilight added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2026
Resolve conflicts from PR #122 quick fixes merging into main:
- docs/research/kernel-aware-nas.md: combine PR's artifact pack docs with main's generated search description
- scripts/nas_experiment.py: keep both PR's quality constraints/calibration and main's generated_candidate_configs()
- tests/test_arch_cost_model.py: keep both constraint assertions and generated search assertions

none
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant