-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
🔒 Fix mass assignment vulnerabilities in blog and job controllers #16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Adityavanjre
wants to merge
3
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
jules-security-mass-assignment-fix-3297366078245988208
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
62820fb
Fix mass assignment vulnerabilities in blog and job controllers
google-labs-jules[bot] 35d0b1c
Fix mass assignment vulnerabilities in blog and job controllers
google-labs-jules[bot] 28ab850
Fix mass assignment vulnerabilities in blog and job controllers
google-labs-jules[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@ | ||
| const { updateBlog } = require('../controllers/blogController'); | ||
| const { updateJob } = require('../controllers/jobController'); | ||
| const Blog = require('../models/Blog'); | ||
| const Job = require('../models/Job'); | ||
|
|
||
| jest.mock('../models/Blog'); | ||
| jest.mock('../models/Job'); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('Mass Assignment Vulnerability Fixes', () => { | ||
| let req, res; | ||
|
|
||
| beforeEach(() => { | ||
| req = { | ||
| params: { id: 'test-id' }, | ||
| body: {} | ||
| }; | ||
| res = { | ||
| json: jest.fn(), | ||
| status: jest.fn().mockReturnThis() | ||
| }; | ||
| jest.clearAllMocks(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('blogController.updateBlog', () => { | ||
| it('should only update allowed fields and ignore unauthorized fields', async () => { | ||
| const mockBlogDoc = { | ||
| title: 'Old Title', | ||
| author: 'Old Author', | ||
| save: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(true) | ||
| }; | ||
| Blog.findById.mockResolvedValue(mockBlogDoc); | ||
|
|
||
| req.body = { | ||
| title: 'New Title', | ||
| isAdmin: true, // Vulnerable field attempt | ||
| status: 'published', | ||
| _id: 'injected-id' // Vulnerable field attempt | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| await updateBlog(req, res); | ||
|
|
||
| // Expect the explicitly allowed fields to be updated | ||
| expect(mockBlogDoc.title).toBe('New Title'); | ||
| expect(mockBlogDoc.status).toBe('published'); | ||
|
|
||
| // Expect unauthorized fields to NOT be assigned | ||
| expect(mockBlogDoc.isAdmin).toBeUndefined(); | ||
| expect(mockBlogDoc._id).toBeUndefined(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Original un-updated field should remain untouched | ||
| expect(mockBlogDoc.author).toBe('Old Author'); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(mockBlogDoc.save).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(res.json).toHaveBeenCalledWith(true); // Since save() resolves to true | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| describe('jobController.updateJob', () => { | ||
| it('should only update allowed fields and ignore unauthorized fields', async () => { | ||
| const mockJobDoc = { | ||
| role: 'Old Role', | ||
| type: 'Full-time', | ||
| save: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(true) | ||
| }; | ||
| Job.findById.mockResolvedValue(mockJobDoc); | ||
|
|
||
| req.body = { | ||
| role: 'New Role', | ||
| isActive: false, | ||
| isAdmin: true, // Vulnerable field attempt | ||
| _id: 'injected-id' // Vulnerable field attempt | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| await updateJob(req, res); | ||
|
|
||
| // Expect explicitly allowed fields to be updated | ||
| expect(mockJobDoc.role).toBe('New Role'); | ||
| expect(mockJobDoc.isActive).toBe(false); | ||
|
|
||
| // Expect unauthorized fields to NOT be assigned | ||
| expect(mockJobDoc.isAdmin).toBeUndefined(); | ||
| expect(mockJobDoc._id).toBeUndefined(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Original un-updated field should remain untouched | ||
| expect(mockJobDoc.type).toBe('Full-time'); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(mockJobDoc.save).toHaveBeenCalled(); | ||
| expect(res.json).toHaveBeenCalledWith(true); // Since save() resolves to true | ||
| }); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When this package is installed from a clean checkout using the tracked
agency/server/package-lock.json, the newtestscript depends onjestbut the lockfile still has onlynodemonin the server devDependencies and no Jest entries. That leaves the new tests unreproducible and can make lockfile-based installs or dependency verification foragency/serverfail or omit the test runner; update the corresponding lockfile alongside this added dependency.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.