docs: clarify terminology, scope, and architecture model in README#8
Open
mindpower wants to merge 2 commits intoAgent-Card:mainfrom
Open
docs: clarify terminology, scope, and architecture model in README#8mindpower wants to merge 2 commits intoAgent-Card:mainfrom
mindpower wants to merge 2 commits intoAgent-Card:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR updates the README to resolve ambiguity regarding the definitions of "Agent" vs. "Server" and explicitly defines the distinct scopes of the AICard and AICatalog specifications. It introduces the term "AI Service" as the standard logical entity and renames the protocol map to "Interfaces" to avoid naming collisions.
Motivation
Recent discussions (e.g., #6, #4 (comment), #4 (comment)) highlighted that:
Key Changes
Impact
These changes align the documentation with the consensus reached in the schema discussions in V1 schema proposal PR, providing a clearer mental model for implementers integrating both A2A and MCP protocols.