Update Dockerfile #2
Conversation
|
Someone is attempting to deploy a commit to the Amitabh soni's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@AWS-DevOps-shubh has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 5 minutes and 52 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
""" WalkthroughThe Dockerfile was updated to modify the maintainer metadata label in both the build and production stages. The maintainer's name and email were changed, while all other instructions and configurations in the Dockerfile remain unaltered. The Jenkins pipeline was updated to use a generic agent, change Git repository URLs, branches, directory names, Docker image references, and email notification recipients. The Kubernetes secrets manifest was updated by replacing placeholder secret values with actual base64-encoded strings for several keys and removed the GOOGLE_ID field. The Kubernetes ConfigMap was updated to replace a placeholder URL with a concrete URL and added new keys for Google OAuth client ID, MongoDB URI, and MongoDB root username. The ingress resource was updated to change the TLS and HTTP host domain names. The Kubernetes deployment manifest was updated to change the container image reference. The ClusterIssuer email was updated from a placeholder to a specific email address. No changes were made to pipeline logic or control flow. Changes
Poem
""" Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Dockerfile (2)
7-9: Updated maintainer metadata label
Themaintainerlabel in the build stage has been updated correctly. Consider adopting the OCI Image Specification labels—such asorg.opencontainers.image.authors—for broader compatibility with image tooling and registries.
30-32: Consistent metadata update in production stage
The production stage’smaintainerlabel now mirrors the build stage change, maintaining consistency. You may standardize on OCI labels here as well to future-proof your metadata.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Dockerfile(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Dockerfile (1)
50-50: Verify CMD change annotation
The AI summary notes that the finalCMD ["npm", "start"]instruction remains unchanged, yet it’s marked as modified. Please confirm whether this line was intentionally updated or if the summary should be corrected.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
GitOps/Jenkinsfile (3)
32-32: Use a more precise regex for manifest updates
The.*in thesedpattern is greedy and could replace unintended parts of the file. Refine to target just the tag portion (e.g.,:[^'"]*) or consider usingkubectl set imagefor safer in-place updates.
51-51: Prefer remote alias over hardcoded URL forgit push
Pushing by full URL can bypass credential helpers and remote configuration. Use the remote alias (origin):- git push https://github.com/AWS-DevOps-shubh/dev-gemini-clone.git dev-shubh + git push origin dev-shubh
109-109: Avoid hardcoding notification recipient addresses
Hardcoding"[email protected]"in two places complicates future changes and exposes PII in pipeline code. Consider parameterizing the recipient list or using credentials/global settings.Also applies to: 161-161
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
GitOps/Jenkinsfile(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
GitOps/Jenkinsfile (2)
4-4: Verify environment compatibility withagent any
Usingagent anyallows the pipeline to run on any available executor, which may lack required tools (Docker, kubectl, git, etc.). Ensure the chosen nodes have the necessary environment or consider pinning to a labeled agent.
19-19: Specify branch and credentials for code checkout
Theclonehelper currently pulls the default branch and may fail for private repos. Explicitly specify thedev-shubhbranch and wrap the clone in credentials (or usecheckout scm) to ensure access.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
kubernetes/secrets.yml (1)
13-13: Placeholder MongoDB URI remains.
TheMONGODB_URIfield still uses<enter-your-mongodb-uri>. Either replace this with a valid base64-encoded URI (if you manage it here) or remove the entry and supply it via your secret management process to avoid deployment failures.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
kubernetes/secrets.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
kubernetes/secrets.yml
10-10: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
12-12: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
kubernetes/secrets.yml
[error] 10-10: syntax error: could not find expected ':'
(syntax)
kubernetes/secrets.yml
Outdated
| GOOGLE_SECRET: R09DU1BYLU9GZ3ZxaWo3X1JXbWZYOTRYOS13UUJnUnZ4bTk= # Enter your Google secret here in base64 encoded format | ||
| NEXTAUTH_SECRET: Qb8YA4ruozWvRotNqdC3thIjkjNkAkPuGGtAWy1etLQ= # Enter your NextAuth secret here in base64 encoded format | ||
| NEXT_PUBLIC_API_KEY: QUl6YVN5QldaYUEwUEtqZ1o3cF9FOC1aX1NwMld6WF9ldi1LeGM0 # Enter your API key here in base64 encoded format |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hardcoded secrets detected.
The manifest contains concrete base64-encoded values for GOOGLE_SECRET, NEXTAUTH_SECRET, and NEXT_PUBLIC_API_KEY. Storing secrets in Git is a critical security risk and may violate compliance. Please use an external secret management solution (e.g., SealedSecrets, SOPS, Vault, or Kubernetes External Secrets) or inject these at deployment time instead of committing them.
Would you like guidance on integrating a secure secret management workflow?
🧰 Tools
🪛 Gitleaks (8.21.2)
10-10: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
11-11: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
12-12: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.
(generic-api-key)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 10-10: syntax error: could not find expected ':'
(syntax)
kubernetes/secrets.yml
Outdated
| GOOGLE_ID: MTAzMzg0MzU1OTMwLWhpZnBta2VhMGo2Z2Z1dm5lZmtwdnJhcTFqdW5vYXVmLmFwcHMuZ29vZ2xl | ||
| dXNlcmNvbnRlbnQuY29t # Enter your Google ID here in base64 encoded format |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
❓ Verification inconclusive
YAML syntax error due to broken multiline value.
The GOOGLE_ID base64 string has been split across two lines, causing a parser error (could not find expected ':'). Combine the value into a single line or use a YAML folded/block literal if you need readability.
Suggested diff to fix:
- GOOGLE_ID: MTAzMzg0MzU1OTMwLWhpZnBta2VhMGo2Z2Z1dm5lZmtwdnJhcTFqdW5vYXVmLmFwcHMuZ29nbGV
-dXNlcmNvbnRlbnQuY29t # Enter your Google ID here in base64 encoded format
+ GOOGLE_ID: "MTAzMzg0MzU1OTMwLWhpZnBta2VhMGo2Z2Z1dm5lZmtwdnJhcTFqdW5vYXVmLmFwcHMuZ29nbGV1c2VyY29udGVudC5jb20=" Fix broken multiline base64 in kubernetes/secrets.yml
The value for GOOGLE_ID is unintentionally split across two lines, which will cause a YAML parsing error (could not find expected ':'). Combine the entire Base64 string into a single line (or use a YAML folded/block literal) and wrap it in quotes.
• File: kubernetes/secrets.yml
• Lines: 8–9
Suggested fix:
- GOOGLE_ID: MTAzMzg0MzU1OTMwLWhpZnBta2VhMGo2Z2Z1dm5lZmtwdnJhcTFqdW5vYXVmLmFwcHMuZ29nbGV
-dXNlcmNvbnRlbnQuY29t # Enter your Google ID here in base64 encoded format
+ GOOGLE_ID: "MTAzMzg0MzU1OTMwLWhpZnBta2VhMGo2Z2Z1dm5lZmtwdnJhcTFqdW5vYXVmLmFwcHMuZ29nbGV1c2VyY29udGVudC5jb20=" # Enter your Google ID here in base64-encoded format
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
kubernetes/gemini-ingress.yml (1)
34-34: Remove trailing whitespace
Trailing spaces on this line may trigger YAML lint errors. Please trim the extra spaces after80.- number: 80 + number: 80🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 34-34: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
kubernetes/gemini-ingress.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
kubernetes/gemini-ingress.yml
[error] 34-34: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
kubernetes/gemini-ingress.yml (2)
18-18: Align HTTP rule host with TLS host
The HTTP rule host now matches the TLS host (geminishubh.34.251.105.234.nip.io), ensuring consistent routing and SNI handling.
14-14:Details
❓ Verification inconclusive
Update TLS host to new nip.io domain
The TLS host has been updated togeminishubh.34.251.105.234.nip.io. Ensure that thegemini-tls-secretcontains a certificate valid for this domain.To verify there are no leftover references to the old domain, run:
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify no stale occurrences of the previous domain remain rg -n 'geminiamitabh.letsdeployit.com'Length of output: 38
Update TLS host & verify old domain removal
The TLS host has been updated togeminishubh.34.251.105.234.nip.io. Ensure thatgemini-tls-secretcontains a certificate valid for this domain. I ranrg -n 'geminiamitabh.letsdeployit.com', and it returned no matches—please manually confirm that no references to the old domain remain before approving these changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
kubernetes/gemini-ingress.yml (1)
34-34: Remove trailing spaces
Line 34 has trailing spaces which can trigger YAML lint errors. Please remove the extra spaces after80.- number: 80 + number: 80🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 34-34: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
kubernetes/gemini-ingress.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
kubernetes/gemini-ingress.yml
[error] 34-34: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
kubernetes/gemini-ingress.yml (2)
14-14: Updated TLS host entry
The TLShostsentry has been updated togeminishubh.34.251.105.234.nip.io. Ensure this hostname is properly configured in DNS and that cert-manager will successfully issue a certificate for it.
18-18: Updated Ingress rule host
The HTTPruleshost now matches the TLS host. Confirm your Ingress controller is receiving traffic forgeminishubh.34.251.105.234.nip.ioand routing it to the correct services.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
kubernetes/gemini-deployment.yml (1)
18-29: Harden Pod Security Settings
NosecurityContextis defined, so the container runs with default privileges (often as root). To satisfy best practices and address Checkov warnings (CKV_K8S_20, CKV_K8S_23), consider adding asecurityContextto the pod or container:spec: containers: - name: gemini securityContext: runAsNonRoot: true allowPrivilegeEscalation: falseThis will minimize the risk of privilege escalation and ensure the container does not run as root.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
kubernetes/gemini-deployment.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
kubernetes/gemini-deployment.yml
[MEDIUM] 1-60: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation
(CKV_K8S_20)
[MEDIUM] 1-60: Minimize the admission of root containers
(CKV_K8S_23)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
kubernetes/gemini-deployment.yml (1)
59-60: Verify New Environment Variable
You’ve added theNEXT_PUBLIC_API_KEYenv var sourced fromgemini-secret. Ensure that thegemini-secretKubernetes Secret contains theNEXT_PUBLIC_API_KEYkey and that its value is intended to be exposed to the application.🧰 Tools
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
[MEDIUM] 1-60: Containers should not run with allowPrivilegeEscalation
(CKV_K8S_20)
[MEDIUM] 1-60: Minimize the admission of root containers
(CKV_K8S_23)
kubernetes/gemini-deployment.yml
Outdated
| containers: | ||
| - name: gemini | ||
| image: amitabhdevops/geminiprod:v1 | ||
| image: devshubh2204/geminiclonenip:latest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Align and Pin Container Image Reference
The image reference was updated to devshubh2204/geminiclonenip:latest, but using the latest tag can lead to unpredictable deployments and cache invalidation issues. Also, ensure that this repository name matches the one configured in your Jenkins pipeline (the PR summary mentions devshubh2204/geminishubham).
Please:
- Confirm the correct image repository name and that it’s consistent across all CI/CD manifests.
- Replace
:latestwith an explicit, immutable tag (e.g.,:v2.0.0) to guarantee reproducible deployments.
I’ll check for all occurrences of the devshubh2204 image reference across your manifests and any CI/CD definitions to confirm consistency. Hold tight while I gather that.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -e
echo "1. Looking for Jenkins pipeline or Groovy definitions…"
find . -type f \( -iname Jenkinsfile -o -iname '*.groovy' -o -iname '*pipeline*' \) -maxdepth 2 || echo " → None found"
echo
echo "2. Scanning for all `devshubh2204` references…"
rg -n "devshubh2204" .
echo
echo "3. Scanning Kubernetes manifests for image lines…"
rg -n "image:" -g "kubernetes/*.yml"Length of output: 1196
Align Image Repository Name & Pin Image Tag
There’s a mismatch between the image in kubernetes/gemini-deployment.yml and your Jenkins pipeline, and using :latest will lead to non-reproducible deployments.
Please choose one of the following fixes:
-
If the intended repo name is geminishubham (as your Jenkinsfile’s
sedexpects):- Update
kubernetes/gemini-deployment.ymlat line 20:- image: devshubh2204/geminiclonenip:latest + image: devshubh2204/geminishubham:${params.GEMINI_DOCKER_TAG}
- Remove any other
:latesttags (e.g. inkubernetes/nginx-deployment.yml) and replace with immutable version tags.
- Update
-
If you want to keep geminiclonenip as the repo:
- Change the
sedinGitOps/Jenkinsfile(line 32) to targetgeminiclonenipinstead ofgeminishubham. - Pin the tag in the manifest similarly:
- image: devshubh2204/geminiclonenip:latest + image: devshubh2204/geminiclonenip:${params.GEMINI_DOCKER_TAG}
- Change the
Either way, avoid :latest so deployments remain deterministic.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| image: devshubh2204/geminiclonenip:latest | |
| image: devshubh2204/geminishubham:${params.GEMINI_DOCKER_TAG} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
kubernetes/cert-issuer.yml (2)
11-11: Cleanup outdated placeholder commentThe inline comment
# Replace with your email addressis no longer necessary now that the email is specified. Removing it will improve readability and prevent confusion.- email: [email protected] # Replace with your email address + email: [email protected]
21-21: Remove trailing whitespaceYAMLlint flagged trailing spaces on this blank line. Removing them will clean up the file and eliminate lint warnings.
- +🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
kubernetes/cert-issuer.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
kubernetes/cert-issuer.yml
[error] 21-21: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit