Skip to content

Restyle [WIP] Literature survey#29

Open
restyled-io[bot] wants to merge 10 commits intomasterfrom
restyled/pull-28
Open

Restyle [WIP] Literature survey#29
restyled-io[bot] wants to merge 10 commits intomasterfrom
restyled/pull-28

Conversation

@restyled-io
Copy link

@restyled-io restyled-io bot commented Oct 13, 2020

A duplicate of #28 with additional commits that automatically address
incorrect style, created by Restyled.

Since the original Pull Request was opened as a fork in a contributor's
repository, we are unable to create a Pull Request branching from it with only
the style fixes.

The following Restylers made fixes:

  • prettier-markdown

To incorporate these changes, you can either:

  1. Merge this Pull Request instead of the original, or

  2. Ask your contributor to locally incorporate these commits and push them to
    the original Pull Request

    Expand for example instructions
    ```console
    git remote add upstream https://github.com/BALaka-18/rake_new2.git
    git fetch upstream pull/<this PR number>/head
    git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
    git push
    ```
    

NOTE: As work continues on the original Pull Request, this process will
re-run and update (force-push) this Pull Request with updated style fixes as
necessary. If the style is fixed manually at any point (i.e. this process finds
no fixes to make), this Pull Request will be closed automatically.

Sorry if this was unexpected. To disable it, see our documentation.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 13, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #29 (ab749f3) into master (c6265f6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #29   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    6.66%   6.66%           
======================================
  Files           5       5           
  Lines         105     105           
======================================
  Hits            7       7           
  Misses         98      98           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 6.66% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c6265f6...ab749f3. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants