Skip to content

Move edit logic into open AI file #35

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 06-16-add_toggle_to_control_buggy_code_and_fixer_usage
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

juancastano
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@benchify benchify bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧪 Benchify Analysis of PR 35

Based on the property-based testing results, here's a summary of the analysis:

The mergeFiles function seems to handle conforming to the benchifyFileSchema and avoiding duplicate file objects for the same path correctly, as the first two properties passed. However, the function fails to give precedence to entries found in updatedFiles over those in existingFiles when both contain a file object with the same path.

The failing test suggests that the mergeFiles function is not correctly merging the files, resulting in incorrect content for common paths. Specifically, the error occurs when the function is expected to return the updated content for common paths, but it returns a different content instead.

To resolve this issue, it's recommended to review the implementation of the mergeFiles function, particularly the logic that handles file objects with the same path in both existingFiles and updatedFiles. Ensure that the function correctly prioritizes the updated content for common paths.

@@ -53,12 +53,25 @@ export async function generateApp(
}
}

// Edit existing application using AI SDK
// Helper function to merge updated files with existing files
function mergeFiles(existingFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>, updatedFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>): z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema> {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Output Schema Compliance

Ensure that the output array of the mergeFiles function conforms to the benchifyFileSchema.

Outcome Example Input # Inputs % of Total
superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"pSqGaaaaa"... view full input 200 100.0%

view all inputs
The property-based test has passed. The mergeFiles function has successfully merged the provided existing and updated files, and the resulting array conforms to the benchifyFileSchema, ensuring that each file has 'path' and 'content' as strings. The test has validated the function's behavior with the given input arrays.

Unit Tests
// Unit Test for "Output Schema Compliance": Ensure that the output array of the `mergeFiles` function conforms to the `benchifyFileSchema`.
function benchify_s(s) {
    return s.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/g, 'a');
}

it('benchify_s_exec_test_passing_0', () => {
  const args = superjson.parse(
    '{"json":[[[{"path":"pSqGaaaaa","content":"YcTaaiMabat"},{"path":"3","content":"Q2a0Raaia"},{"path":"naMlKc","content":"az9laafg0eaP"},{"path":"aFCRAJQaVrza","content":"mmma0TBla"},{"path":"am","content":"aaS5"},{"path":"Bf","content":"adar6qyQy"},{"path":"u06","content":"aFtaw"},{"path":"anfagEaUaIa3","content":"zamWRYGMaa"}],[{"path":"r","content":"a"},{"path":"zXcatGB","content":"c4aSa"},{"path":"aah","content":"er"},{"path":"EaaqxaaxWaa","content":"Xau"},{"path":"seaaaanba","content":"C"}]]]}',
  );

  benchify_s(...args);
});

@@ -53,12 +53,25 @@ export async function generateApp(
}
}

// Edit existing application using AI SDK
// Helper function to merge updated files with existing files
function mergeFiles(existingFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>, updatedFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>): z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema> {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Unique Path Enforcement

The output array should not contain duplicate file objects for the same path.

Outcome Example Input # Inputs % of Total
superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"H%AR_wU","... view full input 200 100.0%

view all inputs
The property-based test has passed, which means the mergeFiles function correctly merges updated files with existing files without creating duplicate file objects for the same path. This test was successfully executed with an example input, ["{\"json\":[[[{\"path\":\"H%AR_wU\",\"content\":\"8ga\"}],[{\"path\":\"{&RFTuJ\",\"content\":\"apply\"}]]]}"], which did not reveal any duplicates in the output array.

Unit Tests
// Unit Test for "Unique Path Enforcement": The output array should not contain duplicate file objects for the same `path`.
function benchify_s(s) {
    return s.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/g, 'a');
}

it('benchify_s_exec_test_passing_0', () => {
  const args = superjson.parse(
    '{"json":[[[{"path":"H%AR_wU","content":"8ga"}],[{"path":"{&RFTuJ","content":"apply"}]]]}',
  );

  benchify_s(...args);
});

@@ -53,12 +53,25 @@ export async function generateApp(
}
}

// Edit existing application using AI SDK
// Helper function to merge updated files with existing files
function mergeFiles(existingFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>, updatedFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>): z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema> {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

❌ Update Prioritization

Ensure that the file objects in the output array give precedence to entries found in updatedFiles over those in existingFiles when both contain a file object with the same path.

Outcome Example Input # Inputs % of Total
superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"R9laUNl4Da... view full input 387 96.8%
superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"a","conten... view full input 13 3.3%

view all inputs
The property test is failing because the mergeFiles function is not correctly giving precedence to entries found in updatedFiles over those in existingFiles when both contain a file object with the same path. In the failed example, the path "a" has a different content in existingFiles ("is") and updatedFiles ("ala"), but the merged result has the content from existingFiles ("aPxaakaaq") instead of the updated one. This is causing the assertion to fail, expecting "V2vC8iaaaey" but receiving "aPxaakaaq".

Stack Trace
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected)

Expected: "V2vC8iaaaey"
Received: "aPxaakaaq"

    at toBe (unknown)
    at <anonymous> (/app/repo/lib/pver_4bc85394-d2cc-4321-8752-16078eaf0d63.test.ts:85:37)
    at forEach (native:1:11)
    at <anonymous> (/app/repo/lib/pver_4bc85394-d2cc-4321-8752-16078eaf0d63.test.ts:79:21)
    at <anonymous> (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:183:11)
    at run (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/property/Property.generic.js:46:33)
    at runIt (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/runner/Runner.js:18:30)
    at check (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/runner/Runner.js:62:11)
    at <anonymous> (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:197:14)
    at assertWithLogging (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:125:3)

@juancastano juancastano marked this pull request as ready for review June 19, 2025 17:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant