-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Move edit logic into open AI file #35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 06-16-add_toggle_to_control_buggy_code_and_fixer_usage
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Move edit logic into open AI file #35
Conversation
Warning This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧪 Benchify Analysis of PR 35
Based on the property-based testing results, here's a summary of the analysis:
The mergeFiles
function seems to handle conforming to the benchifyFileSchema
and avoiding duplicate file objects for the same path
correctly, as the first two properties passed. However, the function fails to give precedence to entries found in updatedFiles
over those in existingFiles
when both contain a file object with the same path
.
The failing test suggests that the mergeFiles
function is not correctly merging the files, resulting in incorrect content for common paths. Specifically, the error occurs when the function is expected to return the updated content for common paths, but it returns a different content instead.
To resolve this issue, it's recommended to review the implementation of the mergeFiles
function, particularly the logic that handles file objects with the same path
in both existingFiles
and updatedFiles
. Ensure that the function correctly prioritizes the updated content for common paths.
@@ -53,12 +53,25 @@ export async function generateApp( | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// Edit existing application using AI SDK | |||
// Helper function to merge updated files with existing files | |||
function mergeFiles(existingFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>, updatedFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>): z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ Output Schema Compliance
Ensure that the output array of the mergeFiles
function conforms to the benchifyFileSchema
.
Outcome | Example Input | # Inputs | % of Total |
---|---|---|---|
✅ | superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"pSqGaaaaa"... view full input |
200 | 100.0% |
view all inputs
The property-based test has passed. The mergeFiles
function has successfully merged the provided existing and updated files, and the resulting array conforms to the benchifyFileSchema
, ensuring that each file has 'path' and 'content' as strings. The test has validated the function's behavior with the given input arrays.
Unit Tests
// Unit Test for "Output Schema Compliance": Ensure that the output array of the `mergeFiles` function conforms to the `benchifyFileSchema`.
function benchify_s(s) {
return s.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/g, 'a');
}
it('benchify_s_exec_test_passing_0', () => {
const args = superjson.parse(
'{"json":[[[{"path":"pSqGaaaaa","content":"YcTaaiMabat"},{"path":"3","content":"Q2a0Raaia"},{"path":"naMlKc","content":"az9laafg0eaP"},{"path":"aFCRAJQaVrza","content":"mmma0TBla"},{"path":"am","content":"aaS5"},{"path":"Bf","content":"adar6qyQy"},{"path":"u06","content":"aFtaw"},{"path":"anfagEaUaIa3","content":"zamWRYGMaa"}],[{"path":"r","content":"a"},{"path":"zXcatGB","content":"c4aSa"},{"path":"aah","content":"er"},{"path":"EaaqxaaxWaa","content":"Xau"},{"path":"seaaaanba","content":"C"}]]]}',
);
benchify_s(...args);
});
@@ -53,12 +53,25 @@ export async function generateApp( | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// Edit existing application using AI SDK | |||
// Helper function to merge updated files with existing files | |||
function mergeFiles(existingFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>, updatedFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>): z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ Unique Path Enforcement
The output array should not contain duplicate file objects for the same path
.
Outcome | Example Input | # Inputs | % of Total |
---|---|---|---|
✅ | superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"H%AR_wU","... view full input |
200 | 100.0% |
view all inputs
The property-based test has passed, which means the mergeFiles
function correctly merges updated files with existing files without creating duplicate file objects for the same path
. This test was successfully executed with an example input, ["{\"json\":[[[{\"path\":\"H%AR_wU\",\"content\":\"8ga\"}],[{\"path\":\"{&RFTuJ\",\"content\":\"apply\"}]]]}"]
, which did not reveal any duplicates in the output array.
Unit Tests
// Unit Test for "Unique Path Enforcement": The output array should not contain duplicate file objects for the same `path`.
function benchify_s(s) {
return s.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/g, 'a');
}
it('benchify_s_exec_test_passing_0', () => {
const args = superjson.parse(
'{"json":[[[{"path":"H%AR_wU","content":"8ga"}],[{"path":"{&RFTuJ","content":"apply"}]]]}',
);
benchify_s(...args);
});
@@ -53,12 +53,25 @@ export async function generateApp( | |||
} | |||
} | |||
|
|||
// Edit existing application using AI SDK | |||
// Helper function to merge updated files with existing files | |||
function mergeFiles(existingFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>, updatedFiles: z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema>): z.infer<typeof benchifyFileSchema> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
❌ Update Prioritization
Ensure that the file objects in the output array give precedence to entries found in updatedFiles
over those in existingFiles
when both contain a file object with the same path
.
Outcome | Example Input | # Inputs | % of Total |
---|---|---|---|
✅ | superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"R9laUNl4Da... view full input |
387 | 96.8% |
❌ | superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"a","conten... view full input |
13 | 3.3% |
view all inputs
The property test is failing because the mergeFiles
function is not correctly giving precedence to entries found in updatedFiles
over those in existingFiles
when both contain a file object with the same path
. In the failed example, the path
"a" has a different content
in existingFiles
("is") and updatedFiles
("ala"), but the merged result has the content
from existingFiles
("aPxaakaaq") instead of the updated one. This is causing the assertion to fail, expecting "V2vC8iaaaey" but receiving "aPxaakaaq".
Stack Trace
Error: expect(received).toBe(expected)
Expected: "V2vC8iaaaey"
Received: "aPxaakaaq"
at toBe (unknown)
at <anonymous> (/app/repo/lib/pver_4bc85394-d2cc-4321-8752-16078eaf0d63.test.ts:85:37)
at forEach (native:1:11)
at <anonymous> (/app/repo/lib/pver_4bc85394-d2cc-4321-8752-16078eaf0d63.test.ts:79:21)
at <anonymous> (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:183:11)
at run (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/property/Property.generic.js:46:33)
at runIt (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/runner/Runner.js:18:30)
at check (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/runner/Runner.js:62:11)
at <anonymous> (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:197:14)
at assertWithLogging (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:125:3)
No description provided.