Move edit logic into open AI file

[juancastano]

No description provided.

[juancastano]

• Fix build errors #39
• Clean up route file #38
• Updated error detection #37
• Fix code preview bug #36
• Move edit logic into open AI file #35 👈 (View in Graphite)
• Add toggle to control buggy code and fixer usage #34
• Fixed a few errors #33
• Fix build errors #32
• Fix error detection again BEN-1078 #31
• Add fix with AI functionality BEN-1080 #30
• Add editing functionality BEN-1079 #29
• Improved error detection BEN-1078 #28
• Adding error screen BEN-1077 #27
• create folder nesting BEN-1076 #26
• add download button BEN-1075 #25
• Add loading state BEN-1074 #24
• Add chat interface BEN-1073 #23
• Add support for adding new npm packages BEN-1072 #22
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[benchify]

🧪 Benchify Analysis of PR 35

Based on the property-based testing results, here's a summary of the analysis:

The mergeFiles function seems to handle conforming to the benchifyFileSchema and avoiding duplicate file objects for the same path correctly, as the first two properties passed. However, the function fails to give precedence to entries found in updatedFiles over those in existingFiles when both contain a file object with the same path.

The failing test suggests that the mergeFiles function is not correctly merging the files, resulting in incorrect content for common paths. Specifically, the error occurs when the function is expected to return the updated content for common paths, but it returns a different content instead.

To resolve this issue, it's recommended to review the implementation of the mergeFiles function, particularly the logic that handles file objects with the same path in both existingFiles and updatedFiles. Ensure that the function correctly prioritizes the updated content for common paths.

[benchify]

✅ Output Schema Compliance

Ensure that the output array of the mergeFiles function conforms to the benchifyFileSchema.

Outcome	Example Input	# Inputs	% of Total
✅	superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"pSqGaaaaa"... view full input	200	100.0%

view all inputs
The property-based test has passed. The mergeFiles function has successfully merged the provided existing and updated files, and the resulting array conforms to the benchifyFileSchema, ensuring that each file has 'path' and 'content' as strings. The test has validated the function's behavior with the given input arrays.

Unit Tests

// Unit Test for "Output Schema Compliance": Ensure that the output array of the `mergeFiles` function conforms to the `benchifyFileSchema`.
function benchify_s(s) {
    return s.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/g, 'a');
}

it('benchify_s_exec_test_passing_0', () => {
  const args = superjson.parse(
    '{"json":[[[{"path":"pSqGaaaaa","content":"YcTaaiMabat"},{"path":"3","content":"Q2a0Raaia"},{"path":"naMlKc","content":"az9laafg0eaP"},{"path":"aFCRAJQaVrza","content":"mmma0TBla"},{"path":"am","content":"aaS5"},{"path":"Bf","content":"adar6qyQy"},{"path":"u06","content":"aFtaw"},{"path":"anfagEaUaIa3","content":"zamWRYGMaa"}],[{"path":"r","content":"a"},{"path":"zXcatGB","content":"c4aSa"},{"path":"aah","content":"er"},{"path":"EaaqxaaxWaa","content":"Xau"},{"path":"seaaaanba","content":"C"}]]]}',
  );

  benchify_s(...args);
});

[benchify]

✅ Unique Path Enforcement

The output array should not contain duplicate file objects for the same path.

Outcome	Example Input	# Inputs	% of Total
✅	superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"H%AR_wU","... view full input	200	100.0%

view all inputs
The property-based test has passed, which means the mergeFiles function correctly merges updated files with existing files without creating duplicate file objects for the same path. This test was successfully executed with an example input, ["{\"json\":[[[{\"path\":\"H%AR_wU\",\"content\":\"8ga\"}],[{\"path\":\"{&RFTuJ\",\"content\":\"apply\"}]]]}"], which did not reveal any duplicates in the output array.

Unit Tests

// Unit Test for "Unique Path Enforcement": The output array should not contain duplicate file objects for the same `path`.
function benchify_s(s) {
    return s.replace(/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/g, 'a');
}

it('benchify_s_exec_test_passing_0', () => {
  const args = superjson.parse(
    '{"json":[[[{"path":"H%AR_wU","content":"8ga"}],[{"path":"{&RFTuJ","content":"apply"}]]]}',
  );

  benchify_s(...args);
});

[benchify]

❌ Update Prioritization

Ensure that the file objects in the output array give precedence to entries found in updatedFiles over those in existingFiles when both contain a file object with the same path.

Outcome	Example Input	# Inputs	% of Total
✅	superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"R9laUNl4Da... view full input	387	96.8%
❌	superjson.parse('{"json":[[[{"path":"a","conten... view full input	13	3.3%

view all inputs
The property test is failing because the mergeFiles function is not correctly giving precedence to entries found in updatedFiles over those in existingFiles when both contain a file object with the same path. In the failed example, the path "a" has a different content in existingFiles ("is") and updatedFiles ("ala"), but the merged result has the content from existingFiles ("aPxaakaaq") instead of the updated one. This is causing the assertion to fail, expecting "V2vC8iaaaey" but receiving "aPxaakaaq".

Stack Trace

Error: expect(received).toBe(expected)

Expected: "V2vC8iaaaey"
Received: "aPxaakaaq"

    at toBe (unknown)
    at <anonymous> (/app/repo/lib/pver_4bc85394-d2cc-4321-8752-16078eaf0d63.test.ts:85:37)
    at forEach (native:1:11)
    at <anonymous> (/app/repo/lib/pver_4bc85394-d2cc-4321-8752-16078eaf0d63.test.ts:79:21)
    at <anonymous> (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:183:11)
    at run (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/property/Property.generic.js:46:33)
    at runIt (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/runner/Runner.js:18:30)
    at check (/app/node_modules/fast-check/lib/esm/check/runner/Runner.js:62:11)
    at <anonymous> (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:197:14)
    at assertWithLogging (/app/configuration/fc.setup.ts:125:3)

[juancastano]

Merge activity

• Jul 9, 8:49 PM UTC: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
• Jul 9, 8:57 PM UTC: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
• Jul 9, 8:59 PM UTC: @juancastano merged this pull request with Graphite.