Skip to content

add Nutanix support to aci_epg_to_domain (DCNE-446) #770

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

camrossi
Copy link

@camrossi camrossi commented Jun 6, 2025

No description provided.

@akinross akinross added the jira-sync Sync this issue to Jira label Jun 16, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title add Nutanix support to aci_epg_to_domain add Nutanix support to aci_epg_to_domain (DCNE-446) Jun 16, 2025
@akinross akinross force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from cc5c005 to b5961c1 Compare June 17, 2025 12:34
@akinross akinross force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from e05239c to 18b3a08 Compare June 17, 2025 13:04
choices: [ enabled, disabled ]
ipam_dhcp_override:
description:
- The IP address management (IPAM) Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) override.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

->

  • The IP Address Management (IPAM) Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) override.

type: str
ipam_enabled:
description:
- The IP address management (IPAM) enabled state.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The IP Address Management (IPAM) enabled state.

type: bool
ipam_gateway:
description:
- The IP address management (IPAM) gateway.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • The IP Address Management (IPAM) gateway.

@akinross akinross requested a review from shrsr June 17, 2025 14:40
shrsr
shrsr previously approved these changes Jun 17, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@shrsr shrsr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

lhercot
lhercot previously approved these changes Jun 17, 2025
Copy link
Member

@lhercot lhercot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

gmicol
gmicol previously approved these changes Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@gmicol gmicol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

sajagana
sajagana previously approved these changes Jun 20, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@sajagana sajagana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

anvitha-jain
anvitha-jain previously approved these changes Jun 20, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@anvitha-jain anvitha-jain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

choices: [ cos_0, cos_1, cos_2, cos_3, cos_4, cos_5, cos_6, cos_7 ]
epg_cos_preference:
description:
- The class of service (CoS) preference.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think you need to expand on the acronyms every time its used in the descriptions. Perhaps one per module should be enough?

Copy link
Collaborator

@shrsr shrsr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@anvitha-jain anvitha-jain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@sajagana sajagana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Copy link
Collaborator

@gmicol gmicol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@samiib samiib left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira-sync Sync this issue to Jira
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants