Skip to content

Conversation

@plbt5
Copy link
Contributor

@plbt5 plbt5 commented May 27, 2022

No description provided.

@ajnelson-nist ajnelson-nist marked this pull request as draft May 27, 2022 14:24
@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

This PR needs to specify:

  • Quorum.
  • Voting procedure respecting majority per class, and 3 of 4 voting classes being present.

This PR, or a follow-on PR, needs to specify:

  • E-voting vs. in-person (rather, on-call) voting.
  • When the "~10-day discussion periods" start.
  • How soon before a meeting a proposal can be posted with "Sufficient notice" for a review discussion. 48 hours? N business days?

@ajnelson-nist
Copy link
Contributor

Also, we no longer have a Bylaws document in CASE, UCO, or CDO; but, we do have a Technical Charter for CDO that defines the voting classes. That charter does not define voting procedure except for the TSC.

Removed some governance syntax that showed strike-outs and additions
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants