Skip to content

[Logs Stateful Encoding] transport layer initial implementation#48879

Open
TheSafo wants to merge 16 commits intologs-stateful-mainfrom
jsaf/stateful-transport-init
Open

[Logs Stateful Encoding] transport layer initial implementation#48879
TheSafo wants to merge 16 commits intologs-stateful-mainfrom
jsaf/stateful-transport-init

Conversation

@TheSafo
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@TheSafo TheSafo commented Apr 3, 2026

What does this PR do?

Implements the "transport" layer of the new gRPC based "stateful encoding" logs protocol (DataDog/agent-payload#443). This explicitly doesn't connect the change to existing pipeline/configuration or pattern extraction code to keep the PR a more reviewable size - follow up PRs will implement that.

Motivation

Partial implementation of experimental new logs protocol.

Describe how you validated your changes

We have tested the full feature end to end against a real Intake as well as in the Lading regression test setup.

How to Review this PR

This change is extracted from #43321 which has the full stateful encoding setup. This PR specifically extracts pkg/logs/sender/grpc (without hooking it up to config or integrating pattern extraction) to turn the transport layer into a more reviewable chunk.

./pkg/logs/sender/grpc/DESIGN.md is included to document how this code works.

Github now includes file filters on the "Files changed" tab to ignore all the go.mod / go.sum changes link

Additional Notes

Same as #46583 but pointed at the new feature branch

https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/EPIN-2660

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

agent-platform-auto-pr Bot commented Apr 3, 2026

Go Package Import Differences

Baseline: a903409
Comparison: 136b0e3

binaryosarchchange
agentlinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
agentlinuxarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
agentwindowsamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
agentdarwinamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
agentdarwinarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
iot-agentlinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
iot-agentlinuxarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
heroku-agentlinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
cluster-agentlinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
cluster-agentlinuxarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
cluster-agent-cloudfoundrylinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
dogstatsdlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
dogstatsdlinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
process-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
process-agentlinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
process-agentwindowsamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
process-agentdarwinamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
process-agentdarwinarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
heroku-process-agentlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
security-agentlinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
security-agentlinuxarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
security-agentwindowsamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
system-probelinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
system-probelinuxarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
system-probewindowsamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
system-probedarwinamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
system-probedarwinarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
otel-agentlinuxamd64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
otel-agentlinuxarm64
+2, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
+github.com/DataDog/datadog-agent/pkg/logs/sender/grpc
privateactionrunnerlinuxamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
privateactionrunnerlinuxarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
privateactionrunnerwindowsamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
privateactionrunnerdarwinamd64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb
privateactionrunnerdarwinarm64
+1, -0
+github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5/statefulpb

@TheSafo TheSafo changed the title Jsaf/stateful transport init [Logs Stateful Encoding] transport layer initial implementation Apr 3, 2026
@TheSafo TheSafo marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2026 19:18
@TheSafo TheSafo requested review from a team as code owners April 3, 2026 19:18
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 136b0e3399

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +121 to +124
statefulInputChan := make(chan *message.StatefulMessage, pkgconfigsetup.Datadog().GetInt("logs_config.message_channel_size"))
grpcsender.StartMessageTranslator(inputChan, statefulInputChan)

return grpcsender.NewBatchStrategy(statefulInputChan, outputChan, flushChan, endpoints.BatchWait, endpoints.BatchMaxSize, endpoints.BatchMaxContentSize, "logs", encoder, pipelineMonitor, instanceID)
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Keep translator and strategy channels in one shutdown domain

In gRPC mode this function starts a long-lived translator from inputChan to statefulInputChan, but the returned strategy only owns (and closes) statefulInputChan on Stop(). Pipeline.Stop() stops the processor first, yet that does not close inputChan, so the translator can remain alive indefinitely; if it is still forwarding buffered messages when statefulInputChan is closed, it will panic on send to a closed channel. This makes shutdown unsafe and leaks goroutines whenever logs_config.use_grpc is enabled.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

s.backoffTimer.Stop()
s.drainTimer.Stop()
if s.batchToSendCh != nil {
close(s.batchToSendCh)
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Prevent double-close of stream send channel during shutdown

tryBeginStreamRotation closes s.batchToSendCh when a stream fails, but the field is left non-nil; if shutdown happens while the worker is in connecting/disconnected/backoff before a new channel is installed, handleShutdown closes the same channel again and panics (close of closed channel). This is a crash path during stop under transient stream failures.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the long review PR is complex, plan time to review it label Apr 3, 2026
@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Files inventory check summary

File checks results against ancestor a9034095:

Results for datadog-agent_7.79.0~devel.git.448.136b0e3.pipeline.106013071-1_amd64.deb:

No change detected

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Static quality checks

❌ Please find below the results from static quality gates
Comparison made with ancestor a903409
📊 Static Quality Gates Dashboard
🔗 SQG Job

Error

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 (on disk) +735.41 KiB (0.10% increase) 753.022 → 753.740 → 753.380
agent_deb_amd64_fips (per-PR threshold) +688.59 KiB (0.09% increase) 709.961 → 710.634 → 713.900
agent_msi (per-PR threshold) +914.16 KiB (0.15% increase) 604.911 → 605.804 → 651.440
agent_rpm_amd64 (on disk) +735.41 KiB (0.10% increase) 753.006 → 753.724 → 753.350
agent_rpm_amd64_fips (per-PR threshold) +688.59 KiB (0.09% increase) 709.945 → 710.617 → 713.880
agent_rpm_arm64 (per-PR threshold) +719.47 KiB (0.10% increase) 731.423 → 732.125 → 735.290
agent_rpm_arm64_fips (per-PR threshold) +668.59 KiB (0.09% increase) 691.387 → 692.039 → 696.840
agent_suse_amd64 (on disk) +735.41 KiB (0.10% increase) 753.006 → 753.724 → 753.350
agent_suse_amd64_fips (per-PR threshold) +688.59 KiB (0.09% increase) 709.945 → 710.617 → 713.880
agent_suse_arm64 (per-PR threshold) +719.47 KiB (0.10% increase) 731.423 → 732.125 → 735.290
agent_suse_arm64_fips (per-PR threshold) +668.59 KiB (0.09% increase) 691.387 → 692.039 → 696.840
docker_agent_amd64 (per-PR threshold) +735.41 KiB (0.09% increase) 813.325 → 814.044 → 815.700
docker_agent_arm64 (per-PR threshold) +719.47 KiB (0.09% increase) 816.512 → 817.215 → 821.970
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 (per-PR threshold) +735.41 KiB (0.07% increase) 1004.241 → 1004.959 → 1006.580
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 (per-PR threshold) +719.47 KiB (0.07% increase) 996.207 → 996.909 → 1001.570
Gate failure full details
Quality gate Error type Error message
agent_deb_amd64 StaticQualityGateFailed static_quality_gate_agent_deb_amd64 failed!
Disk size 753.7 MB exceeds limit of 753.4 MB by 368.8 KB
agent_deb_amd64_fips PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 688.59 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
agent_msi PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 914.16 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
agent_rpm_amd64 StaticQualityGateFailed static_quality_gate_agent_rpm_amd64 failed!
Disk size 753.7 MB exceeds limit of 753.3 MB by 382.9 KB
agent_rpm_amd64_fips PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 688.59 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
agent_rpm_arm64 PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 719.47 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
agent_rpm_arm64_fips PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 668.59 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
agent_suse_amd64 StaticQualityGateFailed static_quality_gate_agent_suse_amd64 failed!
Disk size 753.7 MB exceeds limit of 753.3 MB by 382.9 KB
agent_suse_amd64_fips PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 688.59 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
agent_suse_arm64 PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 719.47 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
agent_suse_arm64_fips PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 668.59 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
docker_agent_amd64 PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 735.41 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
docker_agent_arm64 PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 719.47 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 735.41 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 PerPRThresholdExceeded On-disk size increase of 719.47 KiB exceeds the per-PR threshold of 600.0 KiB

Static quality gates prevent the PR to merge!
You can check the static quality gates confluence page for guidance. We also have a toolbox page available to list tools useful to debug the size increase.
Please either fix the size violation or request an exception.

Successful checks

Info

Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_heroku_amd64 +178.97 KiB (0.06% increase) 313.356 → 313.531 → 320.580
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 +174.84 KiB (0.08% increase) 203.933 → 204.104 → 206.270
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 +230.84 KiB (0.10% increase) 218.357 → 218.582 → 220.000
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 +47.51 KiB (0.12% increase) 39.234 → 39.281 → 39.380
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 +67.53 KiB (0.18% increase) 37.445 → 37.511 → 37.940
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 +39.53 KiB (0.13% increase) 29.886 → 29.924 → 30.610
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 +43.53 KiB (0.15% increase) 28.034 → 28.077 → 29.110
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 +39.53 KiB (0.13% increase) 29.886 → 29.924 → 30.610
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 +39.53 KiB (0.13% increase) 29.886 → 29.924 → 30.610
iot_agent_deb_amd64 +174.88 KiB (0.39% increase) 43.239 → 43.410 → 44.290
iot_agent_deb_arm64 +174.84 KiB (0.42% increase) 40.286 → 40.456 → 41.920
iot_agent_deb_armhf +178.49 KiB (0.42% increase) 41.033 → 41.208 → 42.100
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 +174.88 KiB (0.39% increase) 43.239 → 43.410 → 44.290
iot_agent_suse_amd64 +174.88 KiB (0.39% increase) 43.239 → 43.410 → 44.290
2 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
Quality gate Current Size
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 7.142 MiB
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 6.689 MiB
On-wire sizes (compressed)
Quality gate Change Size (prev → curr → max)
agent_deb_amd64 +139.72 KiB (0.08% increase) 174.750 → 174.886 → 178.360
agent_deb_amd64_fips +161.08 KiB (0.10% increase) 165.352 → 165.510 → 172.790
agent_msi +196.0 KiB (0.14% increase) 138.414 → 138.605 → 146.220
agent_rpm_amd64 +60.4 KiB (0.03% increase) 177.595 → 177.654 → 181.830
agent_rpm_amd64_fips +30.08 KiB (0.02% increase) 167.672 → 167.701 → 173.370
agent_rpm_arm64 -75.01 KiB (0.05% reduction) 159.574 → 159.501 → 163.060
agent_rpm_arm64_fips +194.63 KiB (0.13% increase) 151.401 → 151.591 → 156.170
agent_suse_amd64 +60.4 KiB (0.03% increase) 177.595 → 177.654 → 181.830
agent_suse_amd64_fips +30.08 KiB (0.02% increase) 167.672 → 167.701 → 173.370
agent_suse_arm64 -75.01 KiB (0.05% reduction) 159.574 → 159.501 → 163.060
agent_suse_arm64_fips +194.63 KiB (0.13% increase) 151.401 → 151.591 → 156.170
docker_agent_amd64 +216.16 KiB (0.08% increase) 268.185 → 268.396 → 272.480
docker_agent_arm64 +194.33 KiB (0.07% increase) 255.382 → 255.572 → 261.060
docker_agent_jmx_amd64 +209.67 KiB (0.06% increase) 336.840 → 337.045 → 341.100
docker_agent_jmx_arm64 +200.88 KiB (0.06% increase) 320.012 → 320.208 → 325.620
agent_heroku_amd64 +38.6 KiB (0.05% increase) 75.017 → 75.054 → 79.970
docker_cluster_agent_amd64 +34.48 KiB (0.05% increase) 71.368 → 71.402 → 72.920
docker_cluster_agent_arm64 +42.91 KiB (0.06% increase) 66.996 → 67.038 → 68.220
docker_cws_instrumentation_amd64 neutral 2.999 MiB → 3.330
docker_cws_instrumentation_arm64 neutral 2.729 MiB → 3.090
docker_dogstatsd_amd64 +4.25 KiB (0.03% increase) 15.174 → 15.179 → 15.820
docker_dogstatsd_arm64 +12.77 KiB (0.09% increase) 14.487 → 14.500 → 14.830
dogstatsd_deb_amd64 +6.32 KiB (0.08% increase) 7.893 → 7.899 → 8.790
dogstatsd_deb_arm64 +7.17 KiB (0.10% increase) 6.778 → 6.785 → 7.710
dogstatsd_rpm_amd64 +4.95 KiB (0.06% increase) 7.904 → 7.909 → 8.800
dogstatsd_suse_amd64 +4.95 KiB (0.06% increase) 7.904 → 7.909 → 8.800
iot_agent_deb_amd64 +35.94 KiB (0.31% increase) 11.391 → 11.426 → 13.040
iot_agent_deb_arm64 +31.99 KiB (0.32% increase) 9.712 → 9.744 → 11.450
iot_agent_deb_armhf +29.79 KiB (0.29% increase) 9.931 → 9.960 → 11.620
iot_agent_rpm_amd64 +37.7 KiB (0.32% increase) 11.407 → 11.444 → 13.060
iot_agent_suse_amd64 +37.7 KiB (0.32% increase) 11.407 → 11.444 → 13.060

@cit-pr-commenter-54b7da
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 24ec8ef2-405c-45ab-972e-b3cfbcfe65b9

Baseline: a903409
Comparison: 136b0e3
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.03 [-2.04, +4.10] 1 Logs

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +3.95 [+2.29, +5.60] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
docker_containers_cpu % cpu utilization +1.03 [-2.04, +4.10] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_logs memory utilization +0.79 [+0.69, +0.88] 1 Logs
otlp_ingest_metrics memory utilization +0.63 [+0.47, +0.78] 1 Logs
docker_containers_memory memory utilization +0.53 [+0.44, +0.61] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative memory utilization +0.46 [+0.32, +0.61] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter memory utilization +0.43 [+0.20, +0.65] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders memory utilization +0.35 [+0.29, +0.42] 1 Logs
ddot_metrics memory utilization +0.33 [+0.15, +0.51] 1 Logs
ddot_logs memory utilization +0.29 [+0.23, +0.34] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization +0.26 [+0.23, +0.30] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.14 [+0.09, +0.19] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
ddot_metrics_sum_delta memory utilization +0.11 [-0.06, +0.28] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput +0.05 [-0.17, +0.26] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 ingress throughput +0.02 [-0.19, +0.23] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.43, +0.44] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.11, +0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.41, +0.38] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.02 [-0.08, +0.04] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput -0.02 [-0.56, +0.52] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.16, +0.10] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.08 [-0.26, +0.10] 1 Logs
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory utilization -0.69 [-0.92, -0.46] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed observed_value links
docker_containers_cpu simple_check_run 10/10 704 ≥ 26
docker_containers_memory memory_usage 10/10 274.13MiB ≤ 370MiB
docker_containers_memory simple_check_run 10/10 692 ≥ 26
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.23GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.19GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10 0.21GiB ≤ 1.20GiB
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B
quality_gate_idle intake_connections 10/10 3 = 3 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 172.86MiB ≤ 181MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features intake_connections 10/10 3 = 3 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 491.58MiB ≤ 550MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10 201.63MiB ≤ 220MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs cpu_usage 10/10 357.58 ≤ 2000 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs intake_connections 10/10 4 ≤ 6 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs memory_usage 10/10 431.65MiB ≤ 475MiB bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_metrics_logs missed_bytes 10/10 0B = 0B bounds checks dashboard

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

// Currently this is treated as stream error, which will trigger a stream rotation
// and retry of the same payload, which loops on. this IS NOT the desired behavior.
// TODO: Implement proper handling of irrecoverable errors, by blocking the ingestion
log.Infof("Worker %s: irrecoverable error detected: %s", s.workerID, reason)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should eventually make this either a metric or a log metric to track why some errors happen

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ack. I do have improved metrics in a follow up PR. An open question i have though is what metrics should be shared w/ HTTP vs isolated between the two

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Top of my head i think the following should be shared:

  1. Bytes sent/ bytes dropped
  2. If possible Compression Ratio
  3. Logs component utilization (But i think this might be impossible since 1 is a long lived connection while the other one is per instance)

And the following i think is beneficial to track stateful encoding behavior:

  1. Patterns added/removed
  2. Inflight bytes (backpressure health)
  3. Total state size bytes? (track total state footprints (patterns+tokens+tags*number of pipeline used), but im not sure if we should just count this in a hypothetical sense instead of actually tracking it)

@ddrthall what do you think?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was referenced Apr 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

long review PR is complex, plan time to review it

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants