Ensure "complete" CI steps always run

[marcotc]

This PR ensures the last step of our CI workflows (normally called WORKFLOW NAME (complete)) always run, even when its dependency jobs have failed or been skipped.

This ensures that our mandatory branch protection checks will never be skipped by GitHub. Today when the "complete" job is skipped, the branch protection check considers it successful ‽

Change log entry
No

Additional Notes:

How to test the change?

[p-datadog]

LGTM but I don't understand the GH stuff enough to checkmark

[pr-commenter]

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-03-18 08:32:12

Comparing candidate commit 4db2cc1 in PR branch fix-checks with baseline commit 874e602 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 31 metrics, 2 unstable metrics.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.69%. Comparing base (874e602) to head (4db2cc1).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4506      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.70%   97.69%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1381     1381              
  Lines       83973    83973              
  Branches     4251     4251              
==========================================
- Hits        82046    82036      -10     
- Misses       1927     1937      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[datadog-datadog-prod-us1]

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix-checks
Commit report: 4db2cc1
Test service: dd-trace-rb

✅ 0 Failed, 20632 Passed, 1370 Skipped, 3m 17.78s Total Time

[lloeki]

Today when the "complete" job is skipped, the branch protection check considers it successful ‽

This is normal (and similar to rspec skipping tests?)

In GHA terms, "skipped" means "this step/workflow is not relevant".

e.g running system tests for doc changes makes no sense => skipped, ergo "successful".

This PR would transform a "skipped" UI display materialising the fact that the tests did not run (intentionally so) into a checkmark that looks like as if the tests did run when they actually didn't.

(Again, a skipped test is displayed differently than a passing one in a rspec suite)

even when its dependency jobs have failed

Also "(complete)" should not run when any dependent fail and thus properly result in the PR tests not passing / the PR being unmergeable. Is that the initial reason for this PR? That you'd like it to be red?

Marking this "request changes" to leave the opportunity to discuss, but I don't believe the change should be merged.

See:

• Add synthetic completion steps #4408
• Use dynamic evaluation instead of static path filter #4418

[p-datadog]

@lloeki My reading of the diff is that a skipped status would be changed to failing, not successful, thus there will not actually be a case when a skipped test would be marked as having been run and succeeded?