Skip to content

Conversation

@patrickywl
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do? What is the motivation?

This PR introduces MSP-specific AWS Cloud Cost Management setup documentation under the Partners section.

For background and full context, see the following documents:

Merge instructions

Merge readiness:

  • Ready for merge

For Datadog employees:

Your branch name MUST follow the <name>/<description> convention and include the forward slash (/). Without this format, your pull request will not pass CI, the GitLab pipeline will not run, and you won't get a branch preview. Getting a branch preview makes it easier for us to check any issues with your PR, such as broken links.

If your branch doesn't follow this format, rename it or create a new branch and PR.

[6/5/2025] Merge queue has been disabled on the documentation repo. If you have write access to the repo, the PR has been reviewed by a Documentation team member, and all of the required checks have passed, you can use the Squash and Merge button to merge the PR. If you don't have write access, or you need help, reach out in the #documentation channel in Slack.

Additional notes

@patrickywl patrickywl requested a review from a team as a code owner December 10, 2025 04:32
@github-actions github-actions bot added Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend Images Images are added/removed with this PR labels Dec 10, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@joepeeples
Copy link
Contributor

joepeeples commented Dec 10, 2025

Opened DOCS-12876 to assign a Docs writer and follow up with editorial review.

@joepeeples joepeeples added the editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review label Dec 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Architecture Everything related to the Doc backend editorial review Waiting on a more in-depth review Images Images are added/removed with this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants